Response 221002979

Back to Response listing

Information about you

Contact details and publishing consent:

Please select one item
(Required)
Individual
Ticked Organisation/Group
Organisation/Group name* (Required)
Lothian & Borders Badger Group
Organisation/Group address**
59 Station Road Ratho Station
Organisation/Group postcode**
EH28 8PT
Please select one item
Community organisation
Third sector / equality organisation
Private sector organisation
Representative body for professionals
Local government
Community Planning Partnership
Public Body, including Executive Agencies, NDPBs, NHS etc
Academic or Research Institute
Ticked Other – please state…
Please select one item
(Required)
Ticked Publish this response
Do not publish this response
Your name along with your response
Just your response (anonymous)
Please do not publish my response at all

Clarifying Public Access: core paths planning process

38. At present, section 18 of the 2003 Act is silent on the issue of resolving objections to a core path plan consultation. Do you agree that access authorities should be required, in the interests of transparency, to conduct a further limited consultation about proposed changes arising from objections?

Please select one item
Ticked Yes
No

39. Do you agree that section 20 of the 2003 Act should be clarified so that Ministerial direction is not required when an access authority initiates a core path plan review?

Please select one item
Ticked Yes
No

40. Do you think that the process for a minor amendment to core path plan (as set out in section 20 of the 2003 Act) should be simplified to make it less onerous than that for a full review of a core path plan?

Please select one item
Ticked Yes
No