Building regulations - compliance and enforcements: consultation
Feedback updated 17 Jun 2022
We asked
Following the tragic events at Grenfell Tower, London in June 2017 a Ministerial Working Group (MWG) was set up to oversee a review of building and fire safety with two expert review panels being created. One of the panels considered Compliance and Enforcement.
The review panel on Compliance and Enforcement in Scotland concluded that the Scottish system is not broken but that evidence clearly shows there is a need to strengthen compliance, both in relation to statutory procedural requirements and in addressing non-compliant work on site. The review panel concluded that, whilst simultaneously maintaining the core elements of the system, some reshaping would be advised to ensure that it addresses the identified weaknesses. The focus of this reshaping is to improve aspects of the current system and its implementation, not to fundamentally change it.
In 2018 the Scottish Government consulted on the review panels recommendations which have already been accepted as part of the new Compliance Plan process.
The 2021 consultation sought to build on the findings from 2018. The public consultation on Compliance and Enforcement took place between 11 November 2021 and 9 February 2022.
We asked for views on the development of a new Compliance Plan Manager role within the building standards system which will apply to specific High Risk Building (HRB) types, the definition of these HRBs which proposed:
- Domestic building or residential building with any storey at a height of more than 11 metres above the ground.
- Educational establishments (schools, colleges and universities), community/sport centres and non-domestic buildings under local authority control/where they have an interest in a building.
- Hospitals
- Residential care buildings.
- Housing sites (low-rise).
We sought views on the need for new-build low-rise volume house building to follow the same rigorous process as proposed for HRBs following feedback from the Compliance Plan Working Group (WG). The WG considered that the effect of non-compliant housing, where designed energy compliance is not realised on site, may result in a performance gap. This concern was raised given the current climate concerns.
We also sought views on the level of fines where work is not carried out in accordance with building regulations.
You said
We received a total of 91 responses to the consultation, comprising 36 answering as individuals and 55 answering for/on behalf of their organisation. The main points covering each area were:-
Creation of a new Compliance Plan Manager (CPM) oversight role on High Risk Building types on behalf of the Relevant Person (normally the owner or developer);
The majority of respondents (82%) agree with the CPM role as outlined in Annex B of the consultation document, on projects for all High Risk Buildings (HRBs). The strength of agreement is marginally stronger among organisations compared with individuals. The most prominent reason for agreeing with the CPM role is ensuring greater compliance with building regulations, including better compliance in the case of HRBs.
The definition of High Risk Buildings requiring a CPM;
A high proportion of respondents agreed with the proposed HRBs with support ranging from 74 to 96 per cent. The only outlier was in relation to housing sites (low-rise), which received a more mixed response with support at 36 per cent, undecided 40 per cent and those disagreeing 24 per cent. The strength of agreement is marginally stronger among organisations compared with individuals.
Level of penalties/fines relating to enforcement action under the building standards system;
The majority of respondents (84%) confirmed that they have a view on the introduction of a new enforcement power for local authorities to take action on non-compliant work after the acceptance of the completion certificate. Of those respondents providing supporting comments, approximately half expressed general agreement, albeit with some caveats. It was highlighted that the introduction of such enforcement powers would have varying implications for local authorities, including the need to increase staff and/or funding resources, as well as clarifying additional responsibilities.
We did
An analysis of the responses to the consultation is available and responses have been published on the Scottish Government website where respondents indicated permission to do so.
Following the publication of the consultation analysis report and support for the proposals, we are working with industry stakeholders through Working Groups to develop the policy for strengthening the Scottish building standards system and the approach to compliance and stronger enforcement. This will lead to future legislative changes and associated guidance for system users.
Results updated 17 Jun 2022
Analysis of the building regulations compliance and enforcement consultation which ran between 11 November 2021 and 9 February 2022.
Published responses
View submitted responses where consent has been given to publish the response.
Overview
Building Standards Division (BSD), is developing a national Compliance Plan approach to provide greater assurance that compliance with building regulations is achieved from design to completion.
This consultation seeks to obtain the views on the development of a new Compliance Plan Manager role within the building standards system which will apply to specific High Risk Building (HRB) types, the definition of these HRBs and the level of fines where work is not carried out in accordance with the regulations.
This consultation forms part of the work undertaken by the Compliance Plan Working Group, which is one of seven work streams, being directed by the Building Standards Futures Board. The consultation will gather opinions from stakeholders on a review of the building standards system relating to the way in which compliance with the building regulations is assured and enforced to help ensure the health, safety and welfare of people in and around Scotland’s buildings and to further the conservation of fuel and power and further the achievement of sustainable development.
The consultation covers four main areas, as follows:
-
- Creation of a new Compliance Plan Manager (CPM) oversight role on High Risk Building types on behalf of the Relevant Person (normally the owner or developer);
- The definition of High Risk Buildings requiring a CPM;
- Fines and penalties; and
- Impact assessments.
The proposed changes outlined in the consultation aim to:
Require applicants (building owners and developers) to evidence and document how compliance with the building regulations has been approached from a ‘pre-application meeting’ (initial) stage through to completion of the building project. The intention is to strengthen compliance across all building types with the new Compliance Plan approach and also to introduce a requirement for independent professional oversight - a Compliance Plan Manager - on high risk buildings to manage the compliance process from start to finish. Initial considerations have concentrated on application to High Risk Buildings (high rise residential, high public value - schools, healthcare facilities) and also housing sites. But this may be extended, in the future, to apply to a wider range of buildings types if there is evidence to support this. The consultation also seeks views on the definition of buildings classed as ‘High Risk Building Types’ (HRBs).
Why your views matter
Following the tragic events at Grenfell Tower, London in June 2017 a Ministerial Working Group (MWG) was set up to oversee a review of building and fire safety with two expert review panels being created. One panel considering Fire Safety and the other focussing on Compliance and Enforcement, the latter chaired by Professor John Cole, who had led on the independent inquiry into the collapse of a brick outer wall at Oxgangs Primary school in February 2017 during a storm. The review panels published their reports and recommendations and this consultation focusses on recommendations from the Compliance and Enforcement report.
The Review Panel on Compliance and Enforcement in Scotland concluded that the Scottish system is not broken but that evidence clearly shows there is a need to strengthen compliance both in relation to statutory procedural requirements and in addressing non-compliant work on site.
The report also concluded that the current system in Scotland has much to commend it, in particular the pre-emptive aspect of obtaining a building warrant prior to starting on site. The benefits of this element of the Scottish approach were recognised in the Dame Judith Hackitt Report on Building Standards in England, which recommended the adoption of the Scottish pre-emptive approach for use in the case of high rise residential buildings and other higher risk developments.
Despite the recognised benefits of the current system in Scotland, recent evidence has indicated that there are issues that need to be addressed, particularly in relation to how effectively the system is actually implemented, especially during the construction phase to ensure works are completed as intended with the design and approved building warrant.
The Review Panel concluded that, whilst simultaneously maintaining the core elements of the system, some reshaping would be advised to ensure that it addresses the identified weaknesses. The focus of this reshaping is to improve aspects of the current system and its implementation, not to fundamentally change it.
In 2018 the Scottish Government consulted on the Review Panels recommendations. A total of 222 survey responses were received, and 246 individuals attended awareness events that were held around the country.
This consultation seeks to build on the findings from the 2018 consultation which have already been accepted as part of the new Compliance Plan process and further develop the work on compliance and enforcement. Views are sought on strengthening the system by adding additional requirements, including a new Compliance Plan Manager role that will manage compliance, as set out in the agreed Compliance Plan, from the start of a project through to its completion. It will also look to strengthen enforcement measures by considering the use of fines and penalties for offences.
This CPM role would apply only to High Risk Building Types (HRBs) and the consultation seeks views on the types of buildings classified as HRBs. Views are also sought on whether there should be a requirement to appoint a CPM on existing buildings that would fall within the scope of the HRB definition where they are being created by a conversion or in situations where these types of buildings are being altered or extended.
What happens next
Following analysis of consultation responses, recommendations will be made to Scottish Ministers on relevant changes to current standards and guidance within building regulations.
A consultation analysis document will be produced detailing the responses and the government’s position. This will be added to the consultation webpage once complete.
Interests
- Business, Industry and Innovation
- Building and Planning
- Education
- Health and Social Care
- Housing and Regeneration
Share
Share on Twitter Share on Facebook