The future of secure care and the single point of contact (SPOC) for victims in the Children's Hearings System

Closes 16 Apr 2026

Questions on secure accommodation criteria

Secure accommodation criteria - background information

A child can only currently be placed in secure accommodation if one or more of the following statutory criteria are met:

  • The child has previously absconded (run away) and is likely to abscond again, and would be at risk if they did.
  • The child is likely to engage in self-harming conduct.
  • The child is likely to cause harm to another person.

These criteria apply to placements in secure accommodation by virtue of a number of different legal routes, including placements made on an emergency basis, placements authorised through the Children’s Hearings System, and placements in  in implementation of a decision by a court to place a child on remand or to detain a child.

Currently, this means placement in secure care is restricted to children assessed as posing a risk to self or others, often only when immediate risk is evident. A child either meets this legal definition or does not, and there is currently no statutory concept of ‘adaptable’ levels of security of support. These criteria do not, however, cover all circumstances in which a child may require intensive, highly supportive – and, at times, restrictive – care. As a result, some children can experience placement breakdowns, repeated emergency measures, or care arrangements which may not fully meet their needs.

The 2022 consultation on the Children (Care and Justice) Bill that became the 2024 Act sought views on the definition of secure care. Of those who offered views, 73% did not think the definition of secure accommodation met Scotland’s current and future needs. Respondents felt that the current definition uses language that did not match the vision for secure care set out in The Promise, especially around being therapeutic, trauma-informed, rights-focused, and supportive. Others also felt that the wording of the definition for secure accommodation could be seen to be stigmatising.

As a result, the Children (Care and Justice) (Scotland) Act 2024 included a change to the conditions when a children’s hearing can authorise a child to be placed in secure accommodation. When implemented, the conditions for placing a child in secure accommodation will include:

  • The child has previously absconded (run away) and is likely to abscond again unless the child is kept in secure accommodation; and
  • If the child were to abscond, it is likely that the child’s health, safety or development would be at risk.
  • The child is likely to engage in self-harming conduct unless the child is kept in secure accommodation.
  • The child is likely to cause physical or psychological harm to another person unless the child is kept in secure accommodation.

The Scottish Government has been clear that deprivation of liberty must remain a last resort. However, we recognise that some restrictions are necessary for safety and wellbeing. While residential and secure care offer different levels of restriction, there is currently no dedicated provision for children whose needs fall between these levels of restrictive intensity. To meet these complex needs, we want to explore flexible, integrated supports that prioritise care in environments best suited to each child.

The ‘Reimagining Secure Care’ report suggests creating a new model called “flex secure”. This would provide an approach where the design and operation of service would enable children and young people to be supported from individual restrictions on their liberty to the deprivation of liberty.

This model would offer a more individualised and responsive approach to traditional ‘locked facilities’, with children having some limited additional flexibility and liberty than, for example, being locked in their bedroom overnight. Secure accommodation would still be used when depriving a child of their liberty is necessary for safety, but ‘flex secure’ could provide intensive support for children who do not meet the current legal criteria yet still need intensive support.

The Promise has been clear that children should only be placed in highly restricted environments when necessary and not simply as an escalation when other interventions have failed. Developing environments with adaptable levels of restriction would enable services to respond to the complex needs of individual children in a way that is both flexible and rights-based.

 

Q1. Do you think the new criteria for authorising a child’s placement in secure accommodation by a children’s hearing are sufficient?
Q2. Should the criteria for secure care be revised to include children who, while not posing an immediate risk to others, may still require intensive secure, or near secure, support, protection from self-harm, or stability in near-secure residential provision, including on premises currently registered and approved to deliver secure care?
Q3. Are there any factors or circumstances you think should be considered in potential future secure care criteria?

Examples may include (not exhaustive):

  1. Persistent, severe distress requiring intensive containment.
  2. Repeated placement breakdowns due to complexity of needs.
  3. Serious risk of exploitation.
  4. Harm arising from behaviour that does not fall under self-harm or harm to others.
  5. Situations where intensive support is required for safety.