Changes to the Renewables Obligation (Scotland) scheme

Closed 23 Dec 2021

Opened 11 Nov 2021

Feedback updated 29 Sep 2022

We asked

UK Government made an amendment in March 2021 to its Renewables Obligation Order 2015 increasing the level of the mutualisation threshold, reducing the likelihood of it being triggered.

We asked for your views on making the same changes to mutualisation arrangements under the RO(S) legislation to address electricity supplier payment default.

You said

We received a total of 8 responses to the public consultation.

Four respondents disagreed with the proposal to increase the RO(S) mutualisation threshold and were concerned that this would not address the issue of supplier default.

Stakeholders also raised concerns with the transfer of risk from suppliers to generators in Scotland that would occur with this change. This is because the one percent threshold would increase the frequency of shortfalls not being recovered and ROC prices being pushed down as a result.

Ultimately, the view of these stakeholders was that changing the mutualisation threshold does not reduce the likelihood of a shortfall occurring, it simply changes who bears the cost.

A number of responses also sought further detail on the methodology that would be used to calculate the mutualisation threshold in Scotland citing concern that due to the RO threshold being set at 1% of the total scheme cost (both RO and RO(S)), applying the same threshold in Scotland could lead to ‘double counting’.

There were three responses in favour of the change who cited the administrative benefits of aligning the mutualisation threshold for the RO(S) with the RO.

One of the respondents stated its view that an increase in the mutualisation threshold would restore the balance of risk between suppliers and generators given the value of the scheme has grown significantly since the threshold was set at £1.54m.

In addition to mutualisation the consultation also sought views on a number of options proposed in a recent BEIS/Ofgem consultation that could be used to tackle the issue of supplier default more directly.

While the RO is not the source of supplier default in the GB market, several respondents noted that the administrative arrangements do not provide necessary checks and balances.

All respondents stated their support for more substantive changes on the issue of supplier default and encouraged Scottish Government to continue to work with BEIS and Ofgem as these options are developed to ensure that a consistent approach is delivered across GB.

We did

We have published non-confidential responses to the consultation and an analysis of the consultation responses. The full analysis report can be found here.

Based on the feedback received Scottish Government intends to increase the mutualisation threshold to coincide with the 2023/24 obligation year. We will begin the legislative process in October this year to enable legislation to be enacted before 31 March 2023. 

The decision to introduce this change in 2023/24 has allowed for consideration of options to tackle the issue of supplier default as well as monitoring the impact on RO buy-out payment shortfalls in the context of ongoing market volatility. 

With regards to detail on the methodology that would be used to calculate the mutualisation threshold in Scotland, BEIS rationale for setting the RO threshold at 1% of scheme costs was to restore the threshold to the original intention when mutualisation was introduced for the 2005/06 obligation year, giving an actual RO mutualisation threshold for 2021/22 of £63.7m. 

The RO(S)’s threshold was originally set at 0.1% of scheme costs, to reflect the smaller electricity supply market in Scotland. If the same principle of restoring the current threshold to 0.1% of scheme costs was used, the RO(S)’s threshold for 2021/22 would be £6.37m (rather than the current £1.54m). 

A supplier’s obligation under the RO is based only on the electricity they supplied to customers in England and Wales. So, although the RO’s mutualisation threshold is calculated based on 1% of UK-wide costs, the resulting figure (e.g., a shortfall of £63.7m to trigger mutualisation for 2021/22) is applied only to the England and Wales obligation. A supplier’s obligation under the RO(S) is based only on electricity supplied to customers in Scotland, and that mutualisation threshold is only applied to the RO(S). So, there will be no ‘double counting.’ 

Following the outcome of the UK Government consultation on addressing supplier payment default under the Renewables Obligation (RO) we will work closely with colleagues in BEIS and Ofgem to investigate a move to Fixed Price Certificates, to ensure a coordinated approach is taken across the RO and RO(S). [1] 

[1] BEIS/Ofgem joint response to the Consultation on addressing supplier payment default under the Renewables Obligation (RO) | Ofgem 

Published responses

View submitted responses where consent has been given to publish the response.

Overview

Supplier payment default under the Renewables Obligation (RO) support scheme has emerged in recent years. The scheme features a mutualisation mechanism which seeks to recover unpaid bills from other electricity suppliers once they exceed a threshold. The UK Government recently legislated to increase the level of the mutualisation threshold (England and Wales only) to make it harder for mutualisation to be triggered, but this did not address the underlying causes of payment default.

This consultation, seeks align the RO(S) with changes to the RO designed ensuring consistency of approach and a level playing field for suppliers operating within both schemes.

The Scottish Government’s proposals could have an impact on scheme participants:

  • the owners of ROS accredited generating stations and PPA off-takers who sell renewables obligation certificates (ROCs) to suppliers and brokers
  • electricity suppliers who are under an obligation to acquire renewables obligation certificates (ROCs) or make payments into the scheme’s ‘buy-out’ fund
  • businesses involved in the scheme (e.g. ROC brokers; financiers, advisers etc.)
  • consumers who ultimately fund the scheme through their electricity bills. The Scottish Government is keen to hear the views of all stakeholders on its proposals.

Read the consultation paper 

Why your views matter

Consultation is an essential part of the policy-making process. It gives us the opportunity to consider your opinion and expertise.

The Scottish Government welcomes the views on the proposed amendments.

Interests

  • Energy
  • Environment and Climate Change