Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPPs)

Closes 23 May 2025

Chapter 3 - Model law

The Model anti-SLAPP law (in Appendix B of the consultation paper) was drafted by interested stakeholders to, in their view, give effect to the Scottish Government’s ambition to incorporate international human rights protections into Scots law, the United Kingdom’s ongoing obligations as a member of the Council of Europe, and recent developments in the European Union to counter strategic lawsuits against public participation.

The Model law does not represent the Scottish Government’s views or proposals but is provided merely as a basis for discussion for consultation purposes.

This section asks questions about the Model law.

12. Are you content with the provision on security for costs and damages set out in Section 4?

More information

Section 4

After a motion under Section 1 is made, the court may, without prejudice to the right to access to justice, require that the respondent provide security for the estimated expenses of the proceedings, which may include the expenses of legal representation incurred by the applicant, and damages.

13. Are you content with the remedies made available to defenders in Sections 5 and 7?

More information

Section 5

If the court, pursuant to Section 1 dismisses the proceedings in whole or in part, the applicant is entitled to expenses on the motion and in the main proceeding on a full indemnity basis, unless the court determines that such an award is not appropriate in the circumstances.

Section 7

(1) If the court, pursuant to Section 1 dismisses the proceedings in whole or in part, the court may make an award of damages against the respondent unless the judge determines that such an award is not appropriate in the circumstances

(2) In determining the appropriate amount of damages to award, the court may take into account any distress and anxiety caused to the applicant.

(3) This section does not limit any other basis of claim for damages or remedy that may be available.

14. Are you content with restricting SLAPP pursuer’s entitlement to expenses as set out in Section 6?

More information

Section 6

If the court, pursuant to Section 1 dismisses the proceedings in whole or in part, the respondent is not entitled to expenses on the motion or the main proceedings, unless the court determines that such an award is appropriate in the circumstances.

15. Are you content with imposing penalties on SLAPP pursuers as set out in Section 8?

More information

Section 8

If the court, pursuant to Section 1 dismisses the proceedings in whole or in part, the court may impose effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties on the party who brought the abusive court proceedings against public participation.

16. Are you content with allowing public interest interventions as set out in Section 10?

More information

Section 10

A court seised of court proceedings brought against natural or legal persons on account of their engagement in public participation shall grant leave to intervene to associations, organisations, trade unions and other entities which have a legitimate interest in safeguarding or promoting the rights of persons engaging in public participation, where the applicant so approves.

17. Are Sections 11-12 sufficient to prevent cross-border SLAPPs?

More information

Section 11

The recognition and enforcement of a foreign judgment in Scotland in court proceedings against public participation shall be refused if those proceedings are considered abusive under Section 1 of this Act.

Section 12

A natural or legal person may be sued in Scotland in matters relating to claims for damages incurred by a natural or legal person domiciled in Scotland in connection with abusive court proceedings against public participation brought before a foreign court.

18. Does the Model law give adequate expression to the EU Directive and Council of Europe recommendation while taking account of the specific character of Scots law?
19. Can you envisage any conflicts between the Model law and other provisions of Scots law?
20. Are there any features not included in the Model law that should be considered for inclusion in possible legislation?