Voices in Justice: Parole Reform in Scotland

Closes 11 Nov 2025

This service needs cookies enabled.

Parole process, licence conditions and recall

This section invites respondents to consider the parole system in its constituent parts, including the decision-making function of the Parole Board, the tests and factors that the Board may consider in its decision making; and how people can gain understanding and confidence in that decision making.

This section will explore the potential development of 'progress hearings' and will seek views in this area.  

It will also ask views on the composition of Parole Board panels, and a specific question on a formal review and appeal process for parole decisions.

15. Do you support the introduction of a single overarching, statutory test for release that would apply to all cases considered for release by the Parole Board?
16. Regardless of whether a single test is introduced, or the current process is retained, should the test(s) for release from custody continue to focus solely on risk, or should they be amended to also consider a person’s readiness to reintegrate into the community?
17. Do you have any other views on the assessment and decision-making process around release – for example, other aims that should be reflected, improvements that could be made, or changes in how risk is considered?
18. In principle, do you support the idea of giving the Parole Board for Scotland the power to require post-release progress hearings, at which they can take action based on the person’s progress while in the community on parole?
19. If progress hearings were introduced, what changes do you think the Parole Board should have the power to make, based on the person’s progress while in the community on parole? (select all that apply)
20. If progress hearings were introduced, how long after someone is released on parole should the Board have the power to call a progress hearing for them?
21. If progress hearings were introduced, how frequently should the Board have the power to call a progress hearing for someone on parole in the community?
22. Should the law require that certain professions or expertise must always be represented on a Parole Board oral hearing panel?
23. If specific professions or expertise were to be required at Parole Board oral hearings, which specific professions or expertise do you feel should be included?