Part 4: Criteria for large-scale landholdings
1. Do you agree or disagree with the criteria proposed for classifying landholdings as ‘large-scale’:
| a) A fixed threshold of 3,000 hectares Agree Radio button: Not checked Agree | a) A fixed threshold of 3,000 hectares Disagree Radio button: Checked Disagree | a) A fixed threshold of 3,000 hectares Don't know Radio button: Not checked Don't know |
| b) Land that accounts for more than a fixed percentage of a data zone (or adjacent data zones) or local authority ward(s) designated as an Accessible Rural Area or Remote Rural Area, through our six-fold urban/rural classification scheme Agree Radio button: Not checked Agree | b) Land that accounts for more than a fixed percentage of a data zone (or adjacent data zones) or local authority ward(s) designated as an Accessible Rural Area or Remote Rural Area, through our six-fold urban/rural classification scheme Disagree Radio button: Not checked Disagree | b) Land that accounts for more than a fixed percentage of a data zone (or adjacent data zones) or local authority ward(s) designated as an Accessible Rural Area or Remote Rural Area, through our six-fold urban/rural classification scheme Don't know Radio button: Not checked Don't know |
| c) Land that accounts for more than a specified minimum proportion of a permanently inhabited island Agree Radio button: Not checked Agree | c) Land that accounts for more than a specified minimum proportion of a permanently inhabited island Disagree Radio button: Not checked Disagree | c) Land that accounts for more than a specified minimum proportion of a permanently inhabited island Don't know Radio button: Not checked Don't know |
Please give some reasons for your answers and outline any additional criteria in the text box below:
I really think you are faffing about here. I don't know at this stage what the proposals are
2. Do you agree or disagree that family farms should be exempt from the proposals outlined in Parts 5 to 7 even if they are classified as a ‘large-scale’ landholding?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Ticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Don't know
Please give some reasons for your answer in the text box below:
If family farms are wrecking the countryside with poor practices or practices which ar ebad for your "net-zero" objectibves then why should they be exempt?
3. Do you think that the proposals considered in this consultation should be applied to the urban context?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Yes
Radio button:
Unticked
No
Radio button:
Unticked
Don't know
Please give some reasons for your answer in the text box below:
Well I don't know what your wooly proposals are yet - but urban is imprtotant
Part 5: Strengthening the Land Rights and Responsibilities Statement
4. We propose that there should be a duty on large-scale landowners to comply with the Land Rights and Responsibility Statement and its associated protocols. Do you agree or disagree with this proposal?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Don't know
Please give some reasons for your answer in the text box below:
If I knew what it was then yes I agree. I don't want landowners bulldozing tracks in wild country. I don't want them evicting tenants. I don't want them allowing deer to overgraze natural forest regeneration
5. If there was a legal duty on large-scale landowners to comply with the Land Rights and Responsibility Statement and its associated protocols, we propose that this should be enforced by having a formal procedure for raising complaints, and by making provisions for independent adjudication and enforcement.
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Don't know
Please give some reasons for your answer in the text box below:
I don't understand your woffly question
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Ticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Don't know
Please provide some reasons for your answers and any additional suggestions in the text box below:
You've lost me
Please provide some reasons for your answers and any additional suggestions in the text box below:
Depends on what it is. If someone is poisoning the land with their bad practices its the police who should be dealing with it.
| Recommendation for a mediation process Yes Radio button: Not checked Yes | Recommendation for a mediation process No Radio button: Not checked No | Recommendation for a mediation process Don't know Radio button: Not checked Don't know |
| Recommendation on how the landowner or governing body could comply with the Codes of Practice/protocols Yes Radio button: Checked Yes | Recommendation on how the landowner or governing body could comply with the Codes of Practice/protocols No Radio button: Not checked No | Recommendation on how the landowner or governing body could comply with the Codes of Practice/protocols Don't know Radio button: Not checked Don't know |
| A direction to the landowner or governing body to implement changes to operational and/or management practices Yes Radio button: Not checked Yes | A direction to the landowner or governing body to implement changes to operational and/or management practices No Radio button: Not checked No | A direction to the landowner or governing body to implement changes to operational and/or management practices Don't know Radio button: Checked Don't know |
Please provide some reasons for your answers and any additional suggestions in the text box below:
All too wooly - nicey , nicey. Just make regulatioons and make them comply. If they don't like it, then they can go,
| Financial penalties Yes Radio button: Checked Yes | Financial penalties No Radio button: Not checked No | Financial penalties Don't know Radio button: Not checked Don't know |
| ‘Cross-compliance’ penalties Yes Radio button: Not checked Yes | ‘Cross-compliance’ penalties No Radio button: Not checked No | ‘Cross-compliance’ penalties Don't know Radio button: Not checked Don't know |
6. Do you think the proposal to make the Land Rights and Responsibility Statement and its associated protocols a legal duty for large-scale landowners would benefit the local community?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Yes
Radio button:
Unticked
No
Radio button:
Ticked
Don't know
Please give some reasons for your answer in the text box below:
Some large land holdings are not related to a local community.
7. Do you have any other comments on the proposal to make the Land Rights and Responsibility Statement and its associated protocols a legal duty for large-scale landowners?
Please write your answer in the text box below:
All too vague. I have no faith in offshore trusts based in the Cayman Islands
Part 6: Compulsory Land Management Plans
8. We propose that there should be a duty on large-scale landowners to publish Management Plans. Do you agree or disagree with this proposal?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Don't know
9. How frequently do you think Management Plans should be published?
Please write your answer in the text box below:
Yearly
10. Should Management Plans include information on:
| Land Rights and Responsibility Statement compliance Yes Radio button: Checked Yes | Land Rights and Responsibility Statement compliance No Radio button: Not checked No | Land Rights and Responsibility Statement compliance Don't know Radio button: Not checked Don't know |
| Community engagement Yes Radio button: Checked Yes | Community engagement No Radio button: Not checked No | Community engagement Don't know Radio button: Not checked Don't know |
| Emission reduction plans Yes Radio button: Checked Yes | Emission reduction plans No Radio button: Not checked No | Emission reduction plans Don't know Radio button: Not checked Don't know |
| Nature restoration Yes Radio button: Checked Yes | Nature restoration No Radio button: Not checked No | Nature restoration Don't know Radio button: Not checked Don't know |
| Revenue from carbon offsetting/carbon credits Yes Radio button: Not checked Yes | Revenue from carbon offsetting/carbon credits No Radio button: Not checked No | Revenue from carbon offsetting/carbon credits Don't know Radio button: Not checked Don't know |
| Plans for developments/activities that will contribute to local and inclusive economic development or community wealth building Yes Radio button: Checked Yes | Plans for developments/activities that will contribute to local and inclusive economic development or community wealth building No Radio button: Not checked No | Plans for developments/activities that will contribute to local and inclusive economic development or community wealth building Don't know Radio button: Not checked Don't know |
Please provide some reasons for your answers and any additional suggestions in the text box below:
11. Do you think the responsibility for enforcing compulsory land management plans should sit with:
| the Scottish Government Yes Radio button: Checked Yes | the Scottish Government No Radio button: Not checked No | the Scottish Government Don't know Radio button: Not checked Don't know |
| a public body (such as the Scottish Land Commission) Yes Radio button: Not checked Yes | a public body (such as the Scottish Land Commission) No Radio button: Not checked No | a public body (such as the Scottish Land Commission) Don't know Radio button: Not checked Don't know |
Please provide some reasons for your answers and any additional suggestions in the text box below:
Both
12. Do you think the proposal to make Management Plans a legal duty for large-scale landowners would benefit the local community?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Yes
Radio button:
Unticked
No
Radio button:
Ticked
Don't know
13. Do you have any other comments on the proposal to make Management Plans a legal duty for large-scale landowners?
Please write your answer in the text box below:
I'm sure they will be able to write their plans to satisfy powerless bureaucrats wherever they are
Part 7 i): Regulating the market in large-scale land transfers - a new Public Interest Test
14. We propose that a public interest test should be applied to transactions of large-scale landholdings. Do you agree or disagree with this proposal?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Don't know
15. What do you think would be the advantages and/or disadvantages of applying a public interest test to transactions of large-scale landholdings?
Please write your answer in the text box below:
Why are these things only applicable when the land changes hands?
16. Do you think the public interest test should be applied to:
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
The seller only
Radio button:
Unticked
The buyer only
Radio button:
Ticked
The seller and buyer
Radio button:
Unticked
Don't know
Please give some reasons for your answer in the text box below:
Obvious
17. If the public interest test was applied to the seller, do you think the test should be considered as part of the conveyancing process?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Yes
Radio button:
Unticked
No
Radio button:
Unticked
Don't know
18. Do you think that all types of large-scale landholding transactions (including transfers of shares and transfers within or between trusts) should be in scope for a public interest test?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Yes
Radio button:
Unticked
No
Radio button:
Unticked
Don't know
20. Do you think that a breach of the Lands Right and Responsibilities Statement should be taken into account when determining the outcome of a public interest test?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Yes
Radio button:
Unticked
No
Radio button:
Unticked
Don't know
Please give some reasons for your answer in the text box below:
What's the point of it otherwise
21. Do you think that a public interest test should take into account steps taken in the past by a seller to:
| Diversify ownership Yes Radio button: Checked Yes | Diversify ownership No Radio button: Not checked No | Diversify ownership Don't know Radio button: Not checked Don't know |
| Use their Management Plan to engage with community bodies over opportunities to lease or acquire land Yes Radio button: Checked Yes | Use their Management Plan to engage with community bodies over opportunities to lease or acquire land No Radio button: Not checked No | Use their Management Plan to engage with community bodies over opportunities to lease or acquire land Don't know Radio button: Not checked Don't know |
22. Do you think the responsibility for administering the public interest test should sit with:
Please provide some reasons for your answers and any additional suggestions in the text box below:
who knows?
24. Do you have any other comments on the proposal that a public interest test should be applied to transactions of large-scale landholdings?
Please write your answer in the text box below:
Its good to have a test - but what about all the other land
Part 7 ii): Regulating the market in large-scale land transfers - requirement to notify an intention to sell
25. We propose that landowners selling large-scale landholdings should give notice to community bodies (and others listed on a register compiled for the purpose) that they intend to sell.
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Don't know
Please give some reasons for your answer in the text box below:
But what about if the communitiesjust want a small bit. The other bit may be valuable to Scotland as a whole
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Don't know
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Don't know
Please give some reasons for your answer in the text box below:
good greif
Part 8: New conditions on those in receipt of public funding for land based activity
27. Do you agree or disagree with these requirements?
| Requirement i. Agree Radio button: Checked Agree | Requirement i. Disagree Radio button: Not checked Disagree | Requirement i. Don't know Radio button: Not checked Don't know |
| Requirement ii. Agree Radio button: Checked Agree | Requirement ii. Disagree Radio button: Not checked Disagree | Requirement ii. Don't know Radio button: Not checked Don't know |
28. Do you have any other comments on the proposals outlined above?
Please write your answer in the text box below:
No
Part 9: Land Use Tenancy
29. Do you agree or disagree with our proposal that there should be a Land Use Tenancy to allow people to undertake a range of land management activities?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Don't know
31. Do you think that wider land use opportunities relating to diversification, such as renewable energy and agri-tourism, should be part of a Land Use Tenancy?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Yes
Radio button:
Unticked
No
Radio button:
Unticked
Don't know
32. Do you agree or disagree that a tenant farmer or a small landholder should, with the agreement of their landlord, have the ability to move their agricultural tenancy into a new Land Use Tenancy without having to bring their current lease to an end?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Don't know
33. Do you agree or disagree that when a tenant farmer or small landholders’ tenancy is due to come to an end that the tenant and their landlord should be able to change the tenancy into a Land Use Tenancy without going through the process of waygo, with parties retaining their rights?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Don't know
Part 10: Small landholdings
40. Would you like to be kept informed via email about the Small Landholding Consultation for the Land Reform Bill? We would use the email you provide in the ‘About you’ section to contact you.
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Yes
Radio button:
Unticked
No
Part 11: Transparency: Who owns, controls and benefits from Scotland’s Land
41. Do you agree or disagree with our proposal to explore:
| Who should be able to acquire large-scale landholdings in Scotland Agree Radio button: Checked Agree | Who should be able to acquire large-scale landholdings in Scotland Disagree Radio button: Not checked Disagree | Who should be able to acquire large-scale landholdings in Scotland Don't know Radio button: Not checked Don't know |
| The possibility of introducing a requirement that those seeking to acquire large-scale landholdings in Scotland need to be registered in an EU member state or in the UK for tax purposes Agree Radio button: Checked Agree | The possibility of introducing a requirement that those seeking to acquire large-scale landholdings in Scotland need to be registered in an EU member state or in the UK for tax purposes Disagree Radio button: Not checked Disagree | The possibility of introducing a requirement that those seeking to acquire large-scale landholdings in Scotland need to be registered in an EU member state or in the UK for tax purposes Don't know Radio button: Not checked Don't know |
Please give some reasons for your answer in the text box below:
Nuts that offshore trusts own Scotland. The land belongs to the pople of Scotland. - noyt some Danish businessman - however enlightened he is.
Part 12: Other land related reforms
42. Do you have any views on what the future role of taxation could be to support land reform?
Please write your answer in the text box below:
Bring in a land value tax
44. Do you have any additional ideas or proposals for Land Reform in Scotland?
Please write your answer in the text box below:
1/ We need to halt operations which degrade wild land - including subsidised small scale hydro, unregulated bulldozed hilltracks, windfarms on wild land.
2/ We need to increase energy generation on low grade land - such as the Campsie Fells near Glasgow. We could cover the Campsies with wind turbines and it wouldn't be a problem
3/ We need to re-introduce predators which will reduce deer population. Unpredated deer are responsible for the inability of Scotland's forests to naturally regenerate - key for climate change mitigation
4/ This carbon offsetting thing which somehow is being used by rich folk to buy Scottish wild land to make a buck is ridiculous - just stop it.
5/ We need to encourage local people to start small scale businesses. Why not more saw mils, or small quarries for local building?
6/ Sheep are terrible. They only are there through subsidy. They wreck the land.
7/ Grouse shooting is an anachronistic practice and bad for the ecology of Scotland's landscapes.
8/ Fundamental to community in the Highlands is the ability of people to live there in houses. We need policies to build houses and encourage young people to make their homes there.
9/ Stop planting sitka spruce plantations
2/ We need to increase energy generation on low grade land - such as the Campsie Fells near Glasgow. We could cover the Campsies with wind turbines and it wouldn't be a problem
3/ We need to re-introduce predators which will reduce deer population. Unpredated deer are responsible for the inability of Scotland's forests to naturally regenerate - key for climate change mitigation
4/ This carbon offsetting thing which somehow is being used by rich folk to buy Scottish wild land to make a buck is ridiculous - just stop it.
5/ We need to encourage local people to start small scale businesses. Why not more saw mils, or small quarries for local building?
6/ Sheep are terrible. They only are there through subsidy. They wreck the land.
7/ Grouse shooting is an anachronistic practice and bad for the ecology of Scotland's landscapes.
8/ Fundamental to community in the Highlands is the ability of people to live there in houses. We need policies to build houses and encourage young people to make their homes there.
9/ Stop planting sitka spruce plantations
Part 13: Assessing impact
45. Are you aware of any examples of how the proposals in this consultation might impact, positively or negatively, on island communities in a way that is different from the impact on mainland areas?
Please write your answer in the text box below:
No
48. Are you aware of any examples of potential impacts, either positive or negative, that you consider any of the proposals in this consultation may have on the environment?
Please write your answer in the text box below:
There are obvious trade offs between the needs of local communities and the wider environment. Wind farms are good - but may be bad locally.
My view on these things are that we should sacrifice the mediocre for the sake of the high quality. don't build windfarms on the Highland - build them on places like the Campsies, or other lower quality upland areas near centres of population.
Some of thes issues are urgent from a limate change perspective - so just get on with it
My view on these things are that we should sacrifice the mediocre for the sake of the high quality. don't build windfarms on the Highland - build them on places like the Campsies, or other lower quality upland areas near centres of population.
Some of thes issues are urgent from a limate change perspective - so just get on with it
49. Are you aware of any examples of how the proposals in this consultation might impact, positively or negatively, on groups or areas at socioeconomic disadvantage (such as income, low wealth or area deprivation)?
Please write your answer in the text box below:
Local people need jobs so the maximisation of local jobs shoudl be fundamental. Howver please relaise that a few sheep farmers jobs may need to be sacrificed in favour of land wardens, countryside rangers in some cases
Part 15: About you
What is your name?
Name
Martin Reid
Are you responding as an individual or an organisation?
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button:
Ticked
Individual
Radio button:
Unticked
Organisation