Response 498378209

Back to Response listing

Information about you

Contact details and publishing consent:

Please select one item
(Required)
Individual
Organisation/Group
Please select one item
(Required)
Publish this response
Do not publish this response
Your name along with your response
Just your response (anonymous)
Please do not publish my response at all

Consultation Questions

1. Do you agree with the proposal to make PED notifiable?

Please select one item
Yes
No

2. Could reporting suspicion of PED to QMS delay investigations into other pig diseases that should be notifiable to the Animal and Plant Health Agency?

Please select one item
Yes
No

3. Will the information that must be reported on suspicion or confirmation be sufficient to help QMS support pig keepers?

Please select one item
Yes
No
Enter comments here
With access to ScotEID movements of stock off and on the unit should also allwo identification of risk areas further afar than surrounsing farms. Any unitin direct contact via transport should also be informed.

4. Do the benefits of informing keepers within the local area about a confirmed PED case outweigh any risks to privacy of the affected keeper being identified?

Please select one item
Yes
No
If no, please explain why
If done so along with adequate advice on biosecurity

5. Does the PIA accurately assess the risk of collecting, storing and sharing mandatory information required by the legislative proposal?

Please select one item
Yes
No

6. Does the BRIA accurately reflect the costs and benefits the proposed legislation will bring?

Please select one item
Yes
No

7. Is there an alternative approach to controlling PED that ought to be considered (eg. measures not detailed in the SSI)?

Please select one item
Yes
No

8. Are you content that data collected as part of the industry disease response may be used for additional research purposes?

Please select one item
Yes
No
Please enter comments here
as long as research is done anonymously