Self-referral forensic medical services - retention period for evidence: consultation

This organisation does not feel in a position to define this. This organisation has examples of historic abuse being reported decades later, which has led us to determine the suggested timeline too short.

We feel it is a good thing to be in line with the rest of the UK if it is based on good practice and in line with privacy and data protection guidelines but we are concerned this timeline is based on practicality.

Reporting rates of assault are already low and there is a concern a time limit could create added pressure that would push people into making a decision before they are ready.

We could not find if the suggested timeline takes into account the experiences of people with learning disabilities. In an earlier consultation People First (Scotland) raised the concern that people with learning disabilities often don't know about the services available to them due to the lack of accessible information. Citizens with learning disabilities are historically disempowered through a lack of education around relationships and safe sex, every care must be taken to ensure we are not excluded further.

Accessible information is generally offered inconsistently or not at all. It is essential that services offer accurate and clear, accessible information in order to avoid denying the information to survivors who require that reasonable adjustment. Support to consider and act on the information is required, advocacy may be well placed to support that.

People First (Scotland) recognises these circumstances as another aspect of life where supported decision making would be particularly beneficial. We have developed a framework for supported decision making which describes the ways that could work. This can be read on our website here; http://peoplefirstscotland.org/people-first-scotland/information/