Response 504131458

Back to Response listing

Part One – Consolidating and Modernising Hate Crime Legislation

1. Do you think the statutory aggravation model should continue to be the core method of prosecuting hate crimes in Scotland?

Please select one item
Yes
No
No opinion
Please tell us why:
It should be abolished

2. Do you think that the language of the thresholds for the statutory aggravations would be easier to understand if it was changed from ‘evincing malice and ill will’ to ‘demonstrating hostility’?

Please select one item
Yes
No
Unsure
Please tell us why:
Because your lunacy is a mental illness and not part of law

3. Do you think changing the language of the thresholds for the statutory aggravations from ‘evincing malice and ill will’ to ‘demonstrating hostility’ would change how the thresholds are applied?

Please select one item
Yes
No
Unsure
Please tell us why:
Because none if this is real for sane people

4. Do you think that variations of sex characteristics (intersex) should be a separate category from transgender identity in Scottish hate crime legislation?

Please select one item
Yes
No
Unsure
Please tell us why:
There are 2 genders; man and woman
Redacted textRedacted text

5. Do you think that the terms used in Scottish hate crime legislation in relation to transgender identity and intersex should be updated?

Please select one item
Yes
No
Unsure
Please tell us why:
They should be abolished because it is insane

6. If you think that the terms used in Scottish hate crime legislation in relation to transgender identity and intersex should be updated, what language would you propose?

Please tell us why:
Nothing; there are 2 genders, Redacted textRedacted text

Part Two – New Statutory Aggravations

7. Do you agree with Option A to develop a statutory aggravation for gender hostility?

Please select one item
Yes
No
Unsure
This is insane

8. Do you agree with Option B to develop a standalone offence for misogynistic harassment?

Please select one item
Yes
No
Unsure
If you agree, please tell us why and provide examples of the types of behaviour that could be captured by this offence.
This is insane

9. Do you agree with Option C of building on Equally Safe to tackle misogyny (this would be a non-legislative approach)?

Please select one item
Yes
No
Unsure
If you agree please tell us why.
This is even more insane Redacted text
Please provide examples of the types of behaviour that could be captured by this offence.
There is no offence

10. Do you agree with Option D of taking forward all of the identified options? (This would include development of a statutory aggravation based on gender hostility (Option A); development of a standalone offence relating to misogynistic harassment (Option B); and work to build on Equally Safe (Option C)?

Please select one item
Yes
No
Unsure
If you agree, please tell us why.
I disagree with the entire premise; this is insane
Please provide examples of the types of behaviour that could be captured by this offence.
None; there is no offence therefore no type of behaviour as an example
Any example is insane

11. Do you think that a new statutory aggravation on age hostility should be added to Scottish hate crime legislation?

Please select one item
Yes
No
Unsure
Please provide details:
No, this is insane

12. Do you think there is a need for sectarianism to be specifically addressed and defined in hate crime legislation?

Please select one item
Yes
No (you may wish to go to Question 16)
Unsure
Please give your reasons for your response
This is insane and freedom entails offending religions and culture

13. If your response to question 12 was yes, do you think a statutory aggravation relating to sectarianism should be created and added to Scottish hate crime legislation?

Please select one item
Yes
No (you may wish to go to Q16)
Unsure
Please give your reasons for your response.
insane

14. If yes to question 12, do you think a standalone offence relating to sectarianism should be created and added to Scottish hate crime legislation?

Please select one item
Yes
No
Unsure
Please give your reason for this
insane

15. If your response to question 12 was yes, do you agree with the Working Group that sectarianism should be defined in Scots Law in terms of hostility based on perceived Roman Catholic or Protestant denominational affiliation of the victim and/or perceived British or Irish citizenship, nationality or national origins of the victim?

Please select one item
Yes
No
Unsure
Please give your reason for this.
perceived is in your head thus part of your persoal mental illness

16. If you disagree with the Working Group's proposed definition of sectarianism, what do you believe should be included in a legal definition of sectarianism?

Please give your reason for this
There should be no legal definition
This entire lunacy is a manifestation of a mentally ill person

17. The Scottish Government recognises that legislation on its own will not end sectarianism. What else do you feel could be done to address sectarianism?

Sectarianism exists; so what?
People have the right to dislike other people, for whatever reason, thats what freedom is.
Only a lunatic would not realise this

18. Do you think that a new statutory aggravation on hostility towards a political entity should be added to Scottish hate crime legislation?

Please select one item
Yes
No
Unsure
Please provide details:
No, there should be no law.
The mere fact that this is being discussed is insane

19. Do you think that a new statutory aggravation should be added to Scottish hate crime legislation to cover hostility towards any other new groups or characteristics (with the exception of gender and age)?

Please select one item
Yes
No
No Opinion
Please provide details:
No, there should be no law.
This is insane

20. Do you think that the religious statutory aggravation in Scottish hate crime legislation should be extended to include religious or other beliefs held by an individual?

Please select one item
Yes
No
Unsure
Please provide details:
No, there should be no law
This is insane

21. Do you think that the statutory aggravations in Scottish hate crime legislation should apply where people are presumed to have one or more protected characteristic?

Please select one item
Yes
No
Unsure
Please provide details:
There are no protected characteristics.
This is a fiction from a mentally ill person

22. Do you think that the statutory aggravations in Scottish hate crime legislation should apply where people have an association with that particular identity (relating to religion, sexual orientation, age, gender, race, disability, transgender identity and intersex)?

Please select one item
Yes
No
Unsure
Please tell us why:
No, there should be no law
Even more insane

Part Three – New Stirring Up of Hatred Offences

23. Do you agree with Lord Bracadale’s recommendation that stirring up of hatred offences should be introduced in respect of each of the protected characteristics including any new protected characteristics?

Please select one item
Yes
No
Unsure
Please provide details:
It does not matter what Lord Bracadale ays or does; the fact remains that this nonsense should not be a law.
This law is a mental illness from twisted people

24. Do you agree with Lord Bracadale’s recommendation that any new stirring up hatred offences should require that the conduct is ‘threatening or abusive’?

Please select one item
Yes
No
Unsure
If not, what do you think the threshold should be for the offence to be committed?
No, this should not be a law.
If you believe this then you too are insane

25. Do you think that the existing provisions concerning the stirring up of racial hatred should be revised so they are formulated in the same way as the other proposed stirring up hatred offences?

Please select one item
Yes
No
Unsure
Please provide details:
No, you are unhinged if you believe this mental illness to be a real thing.
There should not be a law!

26. Do you agree with Lord Bracadale’s recommendation that there should be a protection of freedom of expression provision for offences concerning the stirring up of hatred?

Please select one item
Yes
No
Unsure
If you answered yes to the previous question, do you have any comments on what should be covered by any such ‘protection of freedom of expression’ provision?
I believe I do not need any protection of freedom of expression because by its very nature I already have it unless you make lunatic laws that defy reality which necessitate the protection. Its not Lord Bracadale's business what I think or say, he is not someone who determines my mind by force of law.

27. Do you agree with Lord Bracadale’s recommendation that no specific legislative change is necessary with respect to online conduct?

Please select one item
Yes
No
Unsure
Please provide details:
Abandon all of this folly and undo all these unnatural laws that will destroy us in the end.
This is insane

Part Four - Exploitation and Vulnerability

28. Do you think a statutory aggravation (outwith hate crime legislation) should be introduced that could be applied when a perpetrator exploits the vulnerability of the victim?

Please select one item
Yes
No
Unsure
Please provide details:
There are laws existing whe a crime is committed.
Define vulnerability of a victim. I am pretty damn sure you will regard any straight white man as not being within any of your perceived victims group. If you just said yes to that then you are in fact a bigot, racist and heterophobe. Congratulations, you may have broken a law for thinking and saying a word.

29. If you think a statutory aggravation (outwith hate crime legislation) should be introduced that could be applied when a perpetrator exploits the vulnerability of the victim, please provide details of the circumstances that you think such an aggravation should cover?

No

Part Five – Other Issues

30. Do you think that Section 50A of the Criminal Law (Consolidation) (Scotland) Act 1995 about racially aggravated harassment should be repealed?

Please select one item
Yes
No
No Opinion
Please provide details.
Yes, because it is entirely predicated on a racist hatred of white people, by other ethnic groups and races. The entire law being discussed here is legalised racism against white people.
I don't want laws to protect someone saying aa racist thing to me, and anyoe should be able likewise say a "racist" thing.
In fact the whole basis for this legislation is anti-white, anti-heterosexual, and anti-male.
It is insane

31. What do you think the impact of repealing section 50A of the Criminal Law (Consolidations) (Scotland) Act 1995 about racially aggravated harassment could be?

A return to normalcy

32. Do you think that courts should continue to be required to state in open court the extent to which the statutory aggravation altered the length of sentence?

Please select one item
Yes
No
Unsure
Please provide details:
The assertion in court of "statutory aggravation" is more insanity and not a real thing

33. Do you agree that no legislative change is needed in relation to the support given to victims of hate crime offences?

Please select one item
Yes
No
Unsure
Please provide details:
The premise that a "victim" exists is flawed.
Insanity doubled!

35. What else do you think the Scottish Government could include in its proposals to update Scottish hate crime legislation?

They should abolish all laws that say they are hate crimes.
This is a dystopian nightmare from a lunatic asylum.
The pompous clowns wanting this will come unstuck eventually because there is no end game for feminists, anti-whitesRedacted text.
None of this has any place in a legal system.
It is insane

About you

Are you responding as an individual or an organisation?

Please select one item
(Required)
Individual
Organisation

What is your organisation?

-