Section 2: Principles of the Prevention Review Group - wider public bodies and landlords
1. Do you agree that these are the right foundational principles?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Disagree
Please say why
ive worked in hospitals where street homeless people were taken to the door at discharge in a wheelchair and then placed - literally placed back on the street. It was abhorrent, immoral and sickening and yet a daily recurrence. Over the 3 years I worked there 3 homeless people simply died on the steps on the hospital and hours later someone noticed, the horror of this will stay with me for ever.
2. Are there any other principles that should be included? If so, why?
Please say what other principles should be included, and why
Housing first principle should be clearly stated (as it is in Funland), it works, we know it does, so why not do it?
3. Do you agree with the proposals to introduce new duties on public bodies to prevent homelessness?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Disagree
Please say why
Theres no money , we are in the middle of a pandemic,Redacted textthis will focus the authorities on homeless ness otherwsie it will easily be side lined.
4. Do you agree that public bodies should be required to ‘ask and act’ to prevent homelessness?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Disagree
Please say why
BUt, this should be monitored, it sounds like a good idea, but in practice, will it be? and what exactly will they be asking? and how will it be consisytent between areas and what about those who have English as a second language, principle sounds good, but check it out! Redacted text
5. Which public bodies do you think a new duty to prevent homelessness should apply to and why?
Please say which public bodies you think and why
NHS Scotland
local authorities
homeless charities
private provision for homelessness- O know they are not PUBLIC! But wht should they be excluded?
Religious institutions
local authorities
homeless charities
private provision for homelessness- O know they are not PUBLIC! But wht should they be excluded?
Religious institutions
6. Do you agree to introducing a statutory duty on public bodies to prevent homelessness for anybody leaving an institution within six months?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Disagree
Please say why
why 6 months? why not immediately, 6 months is a long long time
7. What would help public bodies to meet this requirement and how might it work in practice?
Please say what you think would help and how would it work in practice
Clear, tried and tested pathways out of homelessness, with easy to access forms and information,
a live cloud based RAG dashboard to see how they(the public bodies) are doing week to week- if you can see you are doing well, it will make you proud to be part of such a great team and work harder, being left guessing if all your hard work has acheived anything demotivates people very quickly.
proactive reviews of cases where it went wrong and people ended up on the street with yearly shared learning between bodies, run on a NO BLAME/RCA basis, this isnt about who is best or rubbish like that, this is about helping the people we serve.
a live cloud based RAG dashboard to see how they(the public bodies) are doing week to week- if you can see you are doing well, it will make you proud to be part of such a great team and work harder, being left guessing if all your hard work has acheived anything demotivates people very quickly.
proactive reviews of cases where it went wrong and people ended up on the street with yearly shared learning between bodies, run on a NO BLAME/RCA basis, this isnt about who is best or rubbish like that, this is about helping the people we serve.
Section 2: Prevention Review Group proposed recommendations for Health and Social Care
8. Do you agree with the proposal that Integration Authorities should identify the housing circumstances of people using health and social care services, and where necessary work with partners to ensure that service users are assisted into suitable housing or prevent the risk of homelessness?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Disagree
9. Do you agree that a new legislative duty on Integration Authorities to identify housing circumstances of patients is the best way to prevent homelessness?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Agree
Radio button:
Ticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Disagree
Please say why
its not the best way, but it will help, prevention of homelessness should be on us all as caring communties, this should be the underlying principle, integrated authorities should set up a frameowrk, traning and support to achieve this,
10. Do you agree that the Integration Authority should have primary legal responsibility for meeting accommodation and support needs where cases are so complex that they cannot be met in mainstream accommodation even with support?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Agree
Radio button:
Ticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Disagree
Please say why
worried that this just means a lot of blame and letters and lawyers but wont actually help the very people we are trying to help here.
11. How would the Integration Authority having primary legal responsibility where cases are so complex work in practice?
Please say how this would work in practice
you are going to need a whole new set if people to get this up and running to avoid variation, with regular monitoring and meetings to see how its going, A bit like the TASKFORCE you have for the FME stuff
12. Do you think a duty on the Integration Authority would positively impact on preventing homelessness for people with a range of more complex needs?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Positively Impact
Radio button:
Ticked
No Impact
Radio button:
Unticked
Negatively Impact
Please say why
I don't think we can say until youve tried it and seen what happens and monitored outcomes, need some good charity and service user involvement the whole way along.
13. Do you agree with the proposal for a social worker or social care worker to have a duty to ‘ask and act’ about housing issues or the risk of homelessness?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Agree
Radio button:
Ticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Disagree
Please say why
But this must be clearly defined, so there is consistency across scotland
14. Do you agree that a duty to co-operate on the Integration Authority is the best way to ensure that people who are homeless or at risk of homelessness, as a result of unmet health or social care needs, get the support they need from health and social care services?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Disagree
Please say why, and if you disagree please explain how this might be addressed
but the effect must be monitored, it sounds like agood idea, but will it be in practice?
I think there is likely to be alot of stigma and pre-held beliefs about homelessness in integration authorties and some basic service user led training and understanding of homelessness might be a good starting point
I think there is likely to be alot of stigma and pre-held beliefs about homelessness in integration authorties and some basic service user led training and understanding of homelessness might be a good starting point
16. Do you agree with the proposal that the local authority must provide assistance to anyone who is going to be discharged from hospital?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Agree
Radio button:
Ticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Disagree
Please say why
refer to my answer to the first question, I think it should be a JOINT reponsibility with the NHS with regular mandatory joint meetings to discuss cases and plan for discharge
17. What would be the main challenges of introducing a statutory duty on local authorities to house those due to be discharged from hospital within the next six months?
Please say what you think the main challenges would be
where are they going to put them? How will they make sure where the people go is safe?
involving charities and thiose with lived experience from the outset
planning services around this- where will they register for a GP?
how will they access food and nexessities of life?
Many homeless people actively avoid hostels because they are often violent and full of drugs and abuse
involving charities and thiose with lived experience from the outset
planning services around this- where will they register for a GP?
how will they access food and nexessities of life?
Many homeless people actively avoid hostels because they are often violent and full of drugs and abuse
18. Do you agree with the the proposal that GP practices are required to refer to local authorities where there is a risk of homelessness identified?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Disagree
Please say why
Always done this anyway (find it rather insuting that you have even included this!), how many letters do GPs get asked for to help someone who is homeless or at risk of homelessness? Redacted text as a GP I usually end up saying we can do it but its likely it will be binned before they even read it- as that appeasr to be what happens- If you want GPs to do it then you will need to make sure it actually helps the patient, Redacted text
19. Are there any additional approaches that could be adopted by GP practices to better identify and respond to housing need?
Please say any additional approaches
I think that offering expert by experience training to help identify people and designing a template that can be placed into EMIS/VISION etc that can easily be accessed and filled out- I know one already exists as it was designed with EMIS in England, its a bit long but could be adapted. Contact PATHWAY a charity based in UCLH in London for details. GPs like templates and it allows the SG to collect data easily to see if its being used and what types of homelessness presents to primary care. Its useful to look for info on modern slavery as well.
Section 2: Prevention Review Group proposed recommendations for case co-ordination for people with multiple or complex needs
20. Do you agree with the proposal that a statutory duty to put a case co-ordination approach in place for people requiring input from two or more public services is the right approach?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Disagree
Please say why
good idea to avoid the 'flock of seagulls 'effect
its hard work being homeless, never mind trying to work out whose helping you !!
its hard work being homeless, never mind trying to work out whose helping you !!
21. If this statutory duty is established, how would it work in practice? What challenges would it present and how could these be best addressed?
If this statutory duty is established, please say how it would work in practice
everyone has to work as a team and as equals, so that any team member can be a co-ordinator of the path out of homelessness, I think it sounds like an amazing, exciting opportiunity for each area to design and trial different appraoches
If this statutory duty is established, please say what challenges it would present and how could these be best addressed
the first and foremost will be staffing and training
and second is ensuring expert by experience involvement
I would combine the 2 and design roles/posts for ex homeless people who want to be co-ordinators and help others off the street/sofa surfing and into permanant housing and jobs.
and second is ensuring expert by experience involvement
I would combine the 2 and design roles/posts for ex homeless people who want to be co-ordinators and help others off the street/sofa surfing and into permanant housing and jobs.
22. What difference would a case co-ordination approach make to people experiencing homelessness or a risk of homelessness who have more complex needs?
Please say what difference you think a legislative duty would make to people experiencing homelessness or a risk of homelessness who have more complex needs
continuity and reduction in huge effort required to access services while trying to stay alive and safe,
Section 2: Prevention Review Group proposed recommendations for Children's Services, young people and 16 and 17 year-olds
23. Do you agree with the proposal to establish a duty on health visitors or head teachers to identify a housing issue or risk of homelessness to a local authority?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Agree
Radio button:
Ticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Disagree
Please say why
they are well placed for this, BUT what about those not in education, how will they be identified and helped?
Again need training from e by e, to reduce stigma
Again need training from e by e, to reduce stigma
24. How would a duty on health visitors or head teachers to identify a housing issue or risk of homelessness to a local authority work in practice? At what stage should a referral be made to the local authority?
How would a duty on health visitors and head teachers work in practice
I would design a form of - at max- 5-10 questions that teachers/HV should ask/find out answers to, to make sure a consistent approach is maintained across scotland. I would set this up electronically via local authrorities and ask them to judge if a YP is 'at risk' of homelessness or already homeless (this is where understanding homelessness and its many forms comes in and why training is important), then send this into the safeguarding team, as becoming homeless is a safeguarding risk, electronic referral will make it easy to monitor situation across scotland and respond to areas in need appropriately. Having an 'at risk' list that could be reviewed monthly might help prevent YP falling into homelessness, this would have to be monitored of course.
At what stage should a referral be made to the local authority
I think as soon as there is a suspicion that there might bea risk of homelessness, make sure LA is aware, with an option to withdraw 'at risk' status is things improve
25. How can we ensure a homelessness prevention service is designed so that it can meet the needs of young people at risk, in partnership with other relevant services?
Please say how we can ensure this
by involving charities and young people themselves in the design, make sure the YP can then use this experience of service design on thier CVs and support them into further education if they want to take it further and work in social care/health. YP must be front and centre of any design not a side line at the end of a meeting- seen that happen too often!
26. Do you agree that a local authority, possibly in partnership with others, should have a family mediation service as part of its legislative duties to prevent youth homelessness?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Agree
Radio button:
Ticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Disagree
Please say why
maybe, once again it sounds like a good idea but everyones rights and capacity to take part must be assessed first, no coercion just to solve a problem, e.g 'you must live with your grandparents', is a common one and much more support for those family members who take a YP on when thier immediate family has rejected them.
27. Do you think the proposal for 16 and 17 year olds would positively impact on the prevention of homelessness for young people?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Positively Impact
Radio button:
Unticked
No Impact
Radio button:
Unticked
Negatively Impact
Please say why
hopefully, but must be monitored with qualitative questionairres and feedback from homeless charities and things progress
28. Could there be any ‘unintended consequences’ for 16 and 17 year olds in taking this approach to legislation? If so, how can this best be addressed so that any new legislation improves outcomes for 16 and 17 year olds at risk of homelessness?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Yes, there could be 'unintended consequences'
Radio button:
Unticked
No, there could not be any
Please say what the 'unintended consequences' could be, and how can this be addressed so that any new legislation improves outcomes for 16 and 17 year olds at risk of homelessness
the risk here is going to be exclusion/stigma- look at what happens to YP who have been in the care system and ask their experiences-overcoming that will only be achieved by invoving thise very people you are trying to help and listening to them.
Section 2: Prevention Review Group proposed recommendations for Criminal Justice - Prisons, Court Services and Police Scotland
29. Do you agree with the proposal to introduce new legal duties on prisons to ask about and work with partners to address housing issues to prevent homelessness?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Disagree
Please say why
cos they'll be back otherwise!
Prison is a safer place then the streetsm and theres food and a bed
Prison is a safer place then the streetsm and theres food and a bed
30. How would a statutory duty on prisons to identify and work with partners on housing issues change existing practice already in place to prevent homelessness amongst those leaving prison?
Please say how you think existing practice would change
make people think about homelessness and support prisoners more consistently
31. What are the main challenges of introducing any new statutory duty on prisons to identify and work with partners on housing issues?
Please say what the main challenges are
the 2 private ones, although they are coming back to SG ? They will have contracts that do not include this new legislation/guidance so they will not have to comply
ensuring all prisons use the same IT systems to allow easy transfer of information about homeless status/health etc
designing interface or adopting new sytems to alow seemless communication between prisons and partners on hosuing issues
legal implications aroud GDPR etc
ensuring all prisons use the same IT systems to allow easy transfer of information about homeless status/health etc
designing interface or adopting new sytems to alow seemless communication between prisons and partners on hosuing issues
legal implications aroud GDPR etc
32. What changes to existing practice would local authorities have to make to ensure they meet the needs of those leaving prison?
Please say what changes to existing practice you think would need to be made
I dont work in this system so not sure
33. Do you agree with the proposal that housing options advice should be available in court settings?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Disagree
Please say why
obvious really. along with benefits advice and where to go for nearest foodbank etc
34. Do you agree with the proposal to place a statutory duty on the police to ask about somebody’s housing circumstances if there is ‘reasonable belief’ they may be homeless or at risk of homelessness?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Disagree
Please say why
should be recorded and central data base kept , and standr=ard questions advised to ensure consustanecy,
anti-stigma training should be given
anti-stigma training should be given
35. How would a statutory duty on police to ask about somebody's housing circumstances if there is a 'reasonable belief' they may be homeless or at risk of homelessness work in practice?
Please say how a statutory duty on police would work in practice
as above
Section 2: Prevention Review Group proposed recommendations for domestic abuse
36. Do you agree that the set of proposed measures on domestic abuse are complementary to each other and consideration should be given to implementing them in full?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Disagree
37. Do you have any comments about the implementation of any specific proposal made in relation to preventing homelessness as a result of domestic abuse, and is there anything missing from these proposals?
Please say your comments, and if you think there is anything missing from these proposals
including access to health care is very improtant, should be made a mandatory part of kt, Redacted text
should include assessment of risk of slavery as this can present as domestic abuse until you look more closely
should include assessment of risk of slavery as this can present as domestic abuse until you look more closely
Section 2: Prevention Review Group proposed recommendations for a local authority duty to respond to referrals
38. Do you agree with the proposal that there should be a statutory duty on a local authority to accept a referral from a public body to prevent homelessness, as part of legislative change that places a duty on public bodies to ‘ask and act’?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Disagree
39. If a statutory duty on local authorities to accept a referral from a public body to prevent homelessness was introduced, what would be the primary advantages and challenges compared to existing arrangements?
Please say what you think the primary advantages would be
ensure consistency across scotland
Please say what you think the primary challenges would be
good data collection
is it happening
when do things go wrong and why
improving the service according to these measures
is it happening
when do things go wrong and why
improving the service according to these measures
40. Do you have a view on the issue of an individual’s consent in this process?
Please say your view
yes, of course, there are a very small group of people who prefer to be homeless and don't want to be forced into housing, if they have capacity then this wish should be respected however we may feel about it.
there is a stigma to homelessness and and individuals consent must be sought and recorded, its about showing respect and empathy
there is a stigma to homelessness and and individuals consent must be sought and recorded, its about showing respect and empathy
Section 2: Prevention Review Group proposed recommendations for joining-up services through strategic planning
41. Should the requirements for joining-up services through strategic planning to prevent homelessness be included in legislation or guidance?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
The requirements should be included in legislation
Radio button:
Unticked
The requirements should be included in guidance
Please say why
because it won't happen otherwise
42. Are there any other requirements for joining-up services through strategic planning that should be considered?
Please say what other requirements should be considered
strategies are just useless documents until they are put into practice
so create one and then it MUST have an action plan with a timeline to deliver and regular reviews, otherwsie its just a huge ewaste of everyones time
so create one and then it MUST have an action plan with a timeline to deliver and regular reviews, otherwsie its just a huge ewaste of everyones time
43. What do you think the implications are of increased joint working to prevent homelessness between public bodies on data sharing and data protection?
Please say what you think
so long as its for direct care, the person is aware their data will be shared and the principles of transparency and 'need to know' are adhered to, shouldnt be a problem
Section 2: Prevention Review Group proposed recommendations for social landlords
44. Do you agree with the new legislative duties to ensure social landlords take specified reasonable steps to prevent homelessness where a risk is identified?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Disagree
Please say why
problem- who is going to want to be a social landlord after this?
45. Are there any other reasonable steps apart from those listed that a social landlord should be legally obliged to take to prevent homelessness?
Please say any other reasonable steps
no, but they will need support and time to deliver this and probably payment, Redacted text
46. Do you agree with the proposal to legislate for the establishment of protocols by social landlords in relation to domestic abuse?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Disagree
Please say why
again, though, how are you going to ensure that there is any social housing left?
47. Do you agree with the proposal to legislate for the establishment of protocols by social landlords in relation to where tenants face court proceedings?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Disagree
48. Given that landlords are already expected to notify local authorities of raising proceedings for possession, do you agree with a new legislative provision to ensure it happens earlier than under current arrangements?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Disagree
49. What further statutory measures beyond the existing Section 11 provision are needed so landlords notify and work with local authorities as soon as possible to prevent homelessness?
Please say what other statutory measures are needed
support and referral pathways for landlords
50. At how early a stage should a landlord be expected to notify a local authority about the risk of homelessness?
Please say how early a stage
missed 2 months rent?
Section 2: Prevention Review Group proposed recommendations for private landlords
51. Do you agree with the proposal to make pre-action requirements on private landlords in cases of rent arrears permanent in legislation?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Disagree
Please say why
just like social landlords, better make sure that doesnt mean they only let to tenants who can pay a big deposit
52. How might a new legislative duty on local authorities to respond to referrals to prevent homelessness from private landlords work in practice?
Please say how this might work in practice
like the social landlord proposal, but would have to be legilated for, and m,aybe licensed?
53. What sort of support do you think private landlords may need to ensure they meet this requirement?
Please say what sort of support would be needed
clear referral pathways and awareness training
54. Do you agree with the proposal that a local authority should have a power to request a delay to eviction to allow time to secure a positive outcome for the tenant?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Disagree
55. The Prevention Review Group propose that the homelessness advice and assistance is designed to meet the needs of people living in and seeking to access the private rented sector. Do you agree with this proposal?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Disagree
56. How would a specific legislative duty on local authorities to provide homelessness advice and assistance relating to living in and/or accessing the private rented sector work in practice?
Please say how this would work in practice
that would be up to them
Section 3: Principles of the Prevention Review Group - reforming homelessness legislation to prevent homelessness
57. Do you agree with these principles?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Disagree
58. Are there any other principles that should be included, if so, why?
Please say what other principles should be included, and why
no
59. What outcomes do you foresee if the above principles were to be adopted to amend the statutory homelessness framework?
Please say what outcomes you foresee
needs to be monitored and see if what seems like a good idea, actually is
Section 3: Changing the current homelessness legislation - An extended prevention duty and duty to take reasonable steps to prevent homelessness
60. Do you agree with the recommendation that there should be changes to existing homelessness legislation to ensure that a local authority must assist somebody threatened with homelessness within the next six months to prevent homelessness?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Disagree
61. How do you think a duty to prevent homelessness within six months would work in practice?
Please say how you think this duty would work in practice
needa a team of co-ordinators and that team must include experts by experience
62. How would an assessment be made to identify whether someone was at risk of homelessness within six months?
Please say how an assessment would be made
needs standard form and questions, desoigned with experts by experience and social care/health
63. Building on the experience of housing options approaches in Scotland, do you agree with the proposal to regulate for making specific measures available or reasonable steps to prevent homelessness in legislation?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Disagree
64. Are there any other specific measures that should be made available or reasonable steps to prevent homelessness that should be included in legislation?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Yes
Radio button:
Unticked
No
Please say why, and what are these other specific measures
a health asssessment- deteriorating health can lead to job loss/homelessness
specifically focussing on addiction and autisctic spectrum/dyslexsia/ADHD
specifically focussing on addiction and autisctic spectrum/dyslexsia/ADHD
65. Do you think the specific measures made available, or reasonable steps duties outlined, are clearly and unambiguously set out so that it is possible to measure their achievement? Do they need to be more specific?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Yes
Radio button:
Unticked
No
Please say why, and how they could be more specific
need to work on much more specific definntions of what is expected, by when and by whom and how it will be monitored
66. If you agree with these new duties, what processes or procedures do you think should be put in place to encourage local authority compliance?
Please say what processes or procedures you think should be put in place
they need money to do this, and time to train staff and access to training for staff
Section 3: Changing the current homelessness legislation - Personal Housing Plans, support needs and reasonable steps
67. How can we best ensure that an applicant’s views are addressed in a statutory assessment to prevent homelessness?
Please say how you think this could be best ensured
try to employ and includr as many e by e (ex homeless) as possible at every stage and listen to them and respect thier views
68. Should personal housing plans form part of a statutory assessment for preventing homelessness by local authorities, or just be an option for local authorities to use with an applicant?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Yes, they should form part of a statutory assessment
Radio button:
Unticked
No, they should be an option
69. Do you agree with the proposal that a local authority should assess housing support needs and make provision to meet them as part of a new prevention of homelessness duty?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Disagree
70. How and at what point do you think an individual's housing support needs should be assessed?
Please say how and at what point needs should be assessed
as soon as they are assessed as being at risk of homelessness
71. An applicant during the time they are receiving prevention assistance under a new prevention duty from the homelessness system experiences loss of accommodation, or other change of circumstances which make the reasonable steps agreed to be carried out no longer valid. What should the process look like to ensure someone always has access to the right assistance for the circumstances they are in?
What should the process look like
24 hour national helpline, if you are suddenly made homeless, what can you do at that moment- like ensurers have after big storms!
72. What assistance should be provided to those who are defined as statutorily homeless but where it may be possible to prevent them from becoming homeless from their current accommodation (while ensuring it meets the definitions of suitable and stable)?
Please say what assistance you think should be provided
again 24 hour helpline with appropriate onward referral as needed
Section 3: Changing the current homelessness legislation - meeting the needs of specific groups
73. Do you agree with the proposal for meeting the needs of specific groups?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Disagree
74. Is there anything you would add to these proposals that may strengthen legislative changes to prevent homelessness amongst specific groups?
Please say what you would add to these proposals to strengthen
health assessment when seen for homelessness, really important not to miss physical/mental health issues that need to be addressed
75. Do you agree with these proposals on preventing homelessness for people experiencing domestic abuse?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Disagree
Please say why
need specifically to think about pets, number of people I habve met over the years who wouldnt leave a violent partner because they were afraid for thier pets
and I've met people whose abusive partner took thier pet and had it put down while they were out/at work, MUST include pets in this
and I've met people whose abusive partner took thier pet and had it put down while they were out/at work, MUST include pets in this
76. Is there anything else that should be included in considering new legislative proposals on the prevention of homelessness resulting from domestic abuse?
Please say what else should be included
no
Section 3: Changing current homelessness legislation - stability and suitability of accommodation
77. Do you agree with the criteria proposed for the stability of housing outcomes?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Disagree
78. Do you agree that 12 months is an appropriate minimum expected period for accommodation to be available (regardless of the type of tenure) for people who are threatened with homelessness or have become homeless?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Disagree
79. How do you see this working in a) a private tenancy; b) accommodation with an occupancy agreement; and c) those returning to the family home or to live with another relative?
Please say how you see these working in a private tenancy
not sure
Please say how you see this working for people returning to the family home or to live with another relative
not sure
80. Are these the right grounds to consider in deciding on the suitability of housing outcomes?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Yes
Radio button:
Unticked
No
81. Do you think the criteria/grounds proposed for both stability and suitability of housing outcomes would allow people a wider range of housing options to either prevent homelessness or rehouse someone who has become homeless, and that could lead to better outcomes for the applicant?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Yes
Radio button:
Unticked
No
82. The Prevention Review Group suggested that accommodation not protected by other legal safeguards must have additional safeguards in place. When taken with the general criteria/grounds for stability and suitability, do the proposed additional safeguards provide the right safeguards to ensure these accommodation types (non-standard) are always suitable and stable? Are there any additional safeguards that could be put in place?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Yes
Radio button:
Unticked
No
Please say why, and if there are additional safeguards that could be put in place
as below
Section 3: Changing the current homelessness legislation - Prevention Review Group proposed recommendations for enforcing people's rights
83. Do you think any additional measures are needed to ensure a right to review by the Local Authority within the proposed legislative measures to prevent homelessness?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Yes
Radio button:
Ticked
No
84. What do you think are the key considerations in any appeal process linked to new legislative measures to prevent homelessness as outlined?
Please say what you think the key considerations are
it must be as fast as possible and high level outcomes reported to ensure fairness
85. Do you have anything to add to the proposal on the role of the Scottish Housing Regulator in relation to proposals for new legislative duties to prevent homelessness?
Please say what you would add to the proposal
no
86. What implications do you think these proposals have for other regulatory bodies?
Please say what you think the implications would be
big ones, will be hard work to begin with
87. Do you agree that there should be a general assessment of housing support needs of persons (separate to assessments for individuals) in an area as part of the Local Housing Strategy?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Disagree
Section 4: Questions on the package of Prevention Review Group proposals, resources and monitoring
88. Do you agree this is the right package of reforms to meet the policy principles of early intervention and preventing homelessness?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Agree
Radio button:
Ticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Disagree
Please say why
but must be monitored and kearnt from because it will never be perfect, there will always be unintended consequences
89. If you do not agree this is the right package of reforms to meet the policy principles of early intervention and preventing homelessness, what do you recommend in terms of other ways of reforming the system to meet these policy principles?
Please say what you recommend in terms of other ways of reforming the system to meet these policy principles?
much better access to neurodiverse assessments and much n=better access to addiction and mental health services
a community approach where evrybody is involved in this, anyone can see a homeless person on the streetm, anyone can reach out and help, lets make this something thats for ALL of scotland , everyones responsibility, we can see this happening with the Ukrainian refugee crisis, we can do this.
a community approach where evrybody is involved in this, anyone can see a homeless person on the streetm, anyone can reach out and help, lets make this something thats for ALL of scotland , everyones responsibility, we can see this happening with the Ukrainian refugee crisis, we can do this.
90. How do you feel about the overall package and the balance it strikes between the different objectives, interests and principles outlined?
Please say how you feel. Please think about whether the package works as a whole, and if it does not, how can the package be adjusted overall to better meet the principles of early intervention and prevention
Its good, but need to specifically add in the need for experts by experince at every level and every implimentation.
91. Please give us your views on the potential impact of the proposed new homelessness prevention duties on different groups of people.
Please say your views
reduce homelessness to near zero!
92. What do you think are the potential implications for your role or for your organisation’s role of the implementation of new duties to prevent homelessness in terms of time and resource?
Please say what you think the implications are
Its a big ask and there's a lot to do.
93. What do you think you or your organisation would be doing to meet new homelessness prevention duties as outlined in this consultation that you were not doing before?
Please say what you think
improving the housing first option, making the hostel a safe place to be, expanding the addiction team, expnading the knowledge and traning of mental health teams
94. Do you think these proposals offer an opportunity for potential savings or benefits to services through an increased focus on early intervention and preventing homelessness?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Yes
Radio button:
Unticked
No
Please say why
but it'll cost up front!
95. What additional training needs do you think will be required for your role or your organisation’s role in implementing any new prevention of homelessness duties, and what do you think the timescales for this would be?
Please say what additional training needs you think will be required, and timescales
lots of co-design and traning and discussion abut homelessness and reducing stigma
96. What monitoring information do you think should be collected in order to best assess the implementation, progress and outcomes of new legislative duties to prevent homelessness?
Please say what information you think should be collected
ive listed these in many of the questions already
Section 5: Questions on the Prevention Review Group proposals on prevention of homelessness duties for people with lived or living experience of housing crisis, homelessness or risk of homelessness
103. There is a proposal that public bodies would need to identify or ‘ask’ whether the people they work with have a risk of homelessness, and then would have a different role and opportunities to ‘act’ on this information. In some cases the action required would be a referral to the local authority. Do you agree with the proposal for a new duty to ‘ask and act’ about homelessness for public bodies such as health, justice, education, etc.?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly Disagree
About you
111. Are you responding as an individual or an organisation?
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button:
Ticked
Individual
Radio button:
Unticked
Organisation