Questions
1. Do you agree with the proposal that the use of remote means for appeal hearings should remain?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Mostly agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Mostly disagree
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly disagree
Please give reasons for your answer.
We have never had the need to use remote means for appeals hearings and would find it prohibitive.
2. Do you agree that video conferencing should be the default option and telephone conferencing, or wholly written means be used only where it is not possible to use video-conferencing?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Mostly agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Mostly disagree
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly disagree
Please give reasons for your answer.
I don't think we should be using video conferencing and definitely not telephone or written. This would be very difficult for parents/carers to make their point as we often find that they submit little prior to the hearing and rely on speaking to their case on the day.
3. Do you agree that remote means should only be used where all parties agree?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Mostly agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Mostly disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly disagree
4. Are there any other improvements that should be made to how remote means is used in appeal hearings for example to mitigate the risk of digital exclusion?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Yes
Radio button:
Ticked
No
Please give reasons for your answer.
I don't think remote means should be used
About you
Are you responding as an individual or an organisation?
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button:
Unticked
Individual
Radio button:
Ticked
Organisation
What is your organisation?
Organisation
Redacted text