Response 931883306

Back to Response listing

Draft Sectoral Marine Plan for Offshore Wind

Do you support the selection of the following draft Plan Options?

E1 Strongly Support Radio button: Not checked Strongly Support E1 Somewhat support Radio button: Not checked Somewhat support E1 Neither support or oppose Radio button: Not checked Neither support or oppose E1 Somewhat oppose Radio button: Not checked Somewhat oppose E1 Strongly oppose Radio button: Not checked Strongly oppose
E2 Strongly Support Radio button: Not checked Strongly Support E2 Somewhat support Radio button: Not checked Somewhat support E2 Neither support or oppose Radio button: Not checked Neither support or oppose E2 Somewhat oppose Radio button: Not checked Somewhat oppose E2 Strongly oppose Radio button: Not checked Strongly oppose
E3 Strongly Support Radio button: Not checked Strongly Support E3 Somewhat support Radio button: Not checked Somewhat support E3 Neither support or oppose Radio button: Not checked Neither support or oppose E3 Somewhat oppose Radio button: Not checked Somewhat oppose E3 Strongly oppose Radio button: Not checked Strongly oppose
NE1 Strongly Support Radio button: Not checked Strongly Support NE1 Somewhat support Radio button: Not checked Somewhat support NE1 Neither support or oppose Radio button: Not checked Neither support or oppose NE1 Somewhat oppose Radio button: Not checked Somewhat oppose NE1 Strongly oppose Radio button: Not checked Strongly oppose
NE2 Strongly Support Radio button: Not checked Strongly Support NE2 Somewhat support Radio button: Not checked Somewhat support NE2 Neither support or oppose Radio button: Not checked Neither support or oppose NE2 Somewhat oppose Radio button: Not checked Somewhat oppose NE2 Strongly oppose Radio button: Not checked Strongly oppose
NE3 Strongly Support Radio button: Not checked Strongly Support NE3 Somewhat support Radio button: Not checked Somewhat support NE3 Neither support or oppose Radio button: Not checked Neither support or oppose NE3 Somewhat oppose Radio button: Not checked Somewhat oppose NE3 Strongly oppose Radio button: Not checked Strongly oppose
NE4 Strongly Support Radio button: Not checked Strongly Support NE4 Somewhat support Radio button: Not checked Somewhat support NE4 Neither support or oppose Radio button: Not checked Neither support or oppose NE4 Somewhat oppose Radio button: Not checked Somewhat oppose NE4 Strongly oppose Radio button: Not checked Strongly oppose
NE5 Strongly Support Radio button: Not checked Strongly Support NE5 Somewhat support Radio button: Not checked Somewhat support NE5 Neither support or oppose Radio button: Not checked Neither support or oppose NE5 Somewhat oppose Radio button: Not checked Somewhat oppose NE5 Strongly oppose Radio button: Not checked Strongly oppose
NE6 Strongly Support Radio button: Not checked Strongly Support NE6 Somewhat support Radio button: Not checked Somewhat support NE6 Neither support or oppose Radio button: Not checked Neither support or oppose NE6 Somewhat oppose Radio button: Not checked Somewhat oppose NE6 Strongly oppose Radio button: Not checked Strongly oppose
NE7 Strongly Support Radio button: Not checked Strongly Support NE7 Somewhat support Radio button: Not checked Somewhat support NE7 Neither support or oppose Radio button: Not checked Neither support or oppose NE7 Somewhat oppose Radio button: Not checked Somewhat oppose NE7 Strongly oppose Radio button: Not checked Strongly oppose
NE8 Strongly Support Radio button: Not checked Strongly Support NE8 Somewhat support Radio button: Not checked Somewhat support NE8 Neither support or oppose Radio button: Not checked Neither support or oppose NE8 Somewhat oppose Radio button: Not checked Somewhat oppose NE8 Strongly oppose Radio button: Not checked Strongly oppose
N1 Strongly Support Radio button: Not checked Strongly Support N1 Somewhat support Radio button: Not checked Somewhat support N1 Neither support or oppose Radio button: Not checked Neither support or oppose N1 Somewhat oppose Radio button: Not checked Somewhat oppose N1 Strongly oppose Radio button: Not checked Strongly oppose
N2 Strongly Support Radio button: Not checked Strongly Support N2 Somewhat support Radio button: Not checked Somewhat support N2 Neither support or oppose Radio button: Not checked Neither support or oppose N2 Somewhat oppose Radio button: Not checked Somewhat oppose N2 Strongly oppose Radio button: Not checked Strongly oppose
N3 Strongly Support Radio button: Not checked Strongly Support N3 Somewhat support Radio button: Not checked Somewhat support N3 Neither support or oppose Radio button: Not checked Neither support or oppose N3 Somewhat oppose Radio button: Not checked Somewhat oppose N3 Strongly oppose Radio button: Not checked Strongly oppose
N4 Strongly Support Radio button: Not checked Strongly Support N4 Somewhat support Radio button: Not checked Somewhat support N4 Neither support or oppose Radio button: Not checked Neither support or oppose N4 Somewhat oppose Radio button: Not checked Somewhat oppose N4 Strongly oppose Radio button: Not checked Strongly oppose
W1 Strongly Support Radio button: Checked Strongly Support W1 Somewhat support Radio button: Not checked Somewhat support W1 Neither support or oppose Radio button: Not checked Neither support or oppose W1 Somewhat oppose Radio button: Not checked Somewhat oppose W1 Strongly oppose Radio button: Not checked Strongly oppose
SW1 Strongly Support Radio button: Not checked Strongly Support SW1 Somewhat support Radio button: Not checked Somewhat support SW1 Neither support or oppose Radio button: Not checked Neither support or oppose SW1 Somewhat oppose Radio button: Not checked Somewhat oppose SW1 Strongly oppose Radio button: Not checked Strongly oppose
Comments on draft Plan Options
Thank you for consulting Argyll and Bute Council on the Sectoral Marine Plan for Offshore Wind Energy consultation.

Opportunities for the deployment of offshore wind technology are welcomed. The Officer strongly supports the W1 DPO to the North West of Islay.

Do you agree with the definition of commercial scale offshore wind farm projects as being projects being capable of generating over 100 MW of electricity ? Do you think this level should be:

Please select one item
Radio button: Unticked Lower (<100 MW)
Radio button: Ticked As is (100 MW)
Radio button: Unticked Higher (>100 MW)
Comment on definition of commercial scale
None

Do you agree that the scientific evidence presented demonstrates that DPOs NE2-6 and E3 are subject to high levels ornithological constraint and, therefore, the mitigation measures outlined in the draft Plan should be applied to these DPOs?

Please select one item
Radio button: Unticked Yes
Radio button: Unticked No
Radio button: Ticked Don't know
Comments on temporal mitigation
N/A

Do you agree that the scientific evidence presented demonstrates the requirements for further regional-level survey work within DPOs E1 and E2?

Please select one item
Radio button: Unticked Yes
Radio button: Unticked No
Radio button: Ticked Don't know
comments on regional-level survey
N/A

Do you have any comments regarding the proposed approach to iterative plan review?

Comments box for iterative plan review
An advisory group will be useful to further inform regular iterative plan reviews, and is welcomed.

Do you have any comments regarding the proposed formation and role of the Advisory Group?

Comments on advisory group
Satisfied with proposals and Project Steering Group members, as set out within the HRA.

If you have any further comments or points that you think should be taken into account in the Plan, please provide these below.

General comments on draft Plan
In regard to the W1 DPO, it will be important to note and ensure that the operation maintenance, and services are located within Argyll, as this will bring important economic benefits, including much needed employment to the region. It will further secure a sustainable future for the communities that are in closest proximity to any future developments.

Sustainability Appraisal

Do you have any comments on the Strategic Environmental Assessment Report?

Comments on the Strategic Environmental Assessment report
Overall, satisfied that a reasonable and comprehensive approach has been undertaken within the Strategic Environmental Assessment Environmental (SEA) Report.

Satisfied that the Baseline Evidence, Potential Effects, Characteristics, and Mitigation Available and Potential Residual Effects in W1 DPO have been thoroughly discussed and concluded upon.

It is agreed that spatial planning and array design at a project level will be key in contributing towards mitigation of any adverse impacts.

It will also be important to note that shore-based infrastructure for servicing developments, cable landing points, substations and connections to national grid will all have potentially significant environmental effects, and will therefore need an individual project level SEA/EIA/HRA, as any proposed project progresses.

Do you have any comments on the Habitats Regulations Assessment?

Comments of the Habitats Regulations Appraisal
The screening of all potential environmental impact pathways and mitigation measures have been undertaken to a satisfactory standard; the Habitat Regulations Appraisal has appropriately and thoroughly considered and assessed species and habitat feature sensitivities in W1 DPO.

Satisfied that a reasonable approach has been taken to conduct a thorough screening and appropriate assessment for the scoping in and out of all European/Ramsar Sites, and habitats and associated species: migratory and non-migratory bird interest features; mammals (cetaceans and seals); migratory fish and freshwater pearl mussel, and otter.

It has been noted that a proportion of the bird dataset, namely from Pollock’s and JNCC studies is over 20 years old. Further investigation and mitigation will therefore be required at the project level to avoid any unacceptable impacts on the Jura, Scarba and the Garvellachs Special Protected Area for bird species, which includes: seabirds, waders, ducks and geese.

Do you have any comments on the Social and Economic Impact Assessment?

Comments on the Social and Economic Impact Assessment
Overall, satisfied that the Social and Economic Impact Assessment (SEIA) indicates that the W1 DPO region would have minor impacts to wildlife and socio-economics for the West Coast and Argyll in particular.

In terms of economic interests and potential impacts to shipping routes, commercial fishing, and marine recreational interests in particular, it will be important to liaise with; CalMac, the Northern Lighthouse Board, the Clyde Fishermen’s Association, and the RYA, to ensure that a detailed impact assessment is undertaken at the project level, as any proposed project progresses.

Do you have any comments on the draft Regional Locational Guidance?

Comments on regional locational guidance
Overall, satisfied with the methodology, results and the considerations that have been included in the West region of the Regional Locational Guidance report.

Do you have any comments on the Sustainability Appraisal report?

Comments on the Sustainability Appraisal
Agree that the Sustainability Appraisal has thoroughly and appropriately assessed all pathways for each sector. Overall, satisfied with the methodology, results and the considerations that have been included in the Sustainability Appraisal.

Agree that there is potential for significant adverse effects on seabed habitats, marine mammals, fish, sediment transport and coastal processes, and visual effects within W1 DPO. However, it is noted that all pathways in W1 DPO have the potential to be mitigated at plan and project levels, either through spatial planning, array design or through turbine design.

It is further recognised that the implementation of the W1 DPO could have a significant environmental benefit in supporting the decarbonisation of the energy sector and aid the establishment of a secure energy supply in Argyll. It will also be important to ensure that the servicing, operation and maintenance bases are located within Argyll, as this will bring important economic benefits, including much needed employment to the region. It will further secure a sustainable future for the communities that are in closest proximity to any future developments.

Supporting Partial Assessments

Would you like to add or change anything in the partial Equality Impact Assessment?

Comments on Equality Impact Assessment
No

Would you add or change anything in the partial Islands Communities Impact Assessment?

Comments on Island Communities mpact Assessment
No

About you

What is your name?

Name
Lorraine Holdstock

Are you responding as an individual or an organisation?

Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button: Unticked Individual
Radio button: Ticked Organisation

What is your organisation?

Organisation
Argyll and Bute Council