Modernising Revenue Scotland’s tax administration framework: communications from Revenue Scotland to taxpayers
Overview
This consultation seeks views on proposed changes that would enable Revenue Scotland to use electronic communications as it default means of communicating with taxpayers. This consultation also explores the case for providing that, where a taxpayer opts out of receiving electronic communications, or is "digitally excluded", Revenue Scotland can serve documents by ordinary post, with associated presumptions of receipt.
For the purposes of this consultation, "electronic communication" is intended to refer to communications transmitted by means of an electronic communications network or by other means but in an electronic form. This would include sending information through a broad range of digital means such as email, text, secure online portals, or other electronic platforms, such as the secure message service through Revenue Scotland's Scottish Electronic Tax System (SETS). It may also include othe rofrms of electronic communications such as social media.
Read the consultation paper. The consultation paper contains full background information for this consultation. You may find it useful to read or refer to while responding.
Consultation questions preview
The consultation questions are included here for your reference. Please click 'Begin consultation' at the bottom of this page to proceed.
1)Do you agree that there are challenges with Revenue Scotland’s current communications practice, as described above? Please provide commentary to explain the basis of your answer.
2)Do you agree with the proposal for Revenue Scotland to move to electronic communications by default, where a taxpayer has provided a means of electronic communication (except where they have opted out or are otherwise digitally excluded)?
Please provide an explanation for your answer
3)Are there alternative approaches which Revenue Scotland could take to facilitate greater use of electronic communications with taxpayers?
4)Do you agree that the definition of electronic communications should provide Revenue Scotland with the flexibility to communicate electronically through a range of measures ?
Please provide an explanation for your answer.
5)Are there any specific circumstances, excluding consideration of opt-out arrangements, where you consider that the use of electronic communications would not be appropriate?
6)What process do you think Revenue Scotland should put in place to enable taxpayers to opt out of receiving electronic communications?
7)What measures should be put in place to ensure that taxpayers are aware of the opt out?
8)Do you agree with the proposal that a copy of an electronic communication will be proof that information was delivered by electronic communications, unless there is evidence to the contrary?
Please provide an explanation for your answer
9)Do you agree with the proposal that a notice transmitted by electronic communications is received on the day of transmission , unless there is evidence to the contrary?
Please provide an explanation for your answer.
10)If in agreement with the proposal, do you agree that it would be appropriate to align with the presumptions already in operation for HMRC?
11)What action could Revenue Scotland take to address the risks of error and uncertainty highlighted above?
12)Do you consider that the audit process and support that Revenue Scotland has in place are effective in supporting taxpayers in their interactions with Revenue Scotland?
Please provide an explanation for your answer.
13)Do you agree that service by ordinary post is a proportionate alternative means of communication to those taxpayers who do not have a digital means of communication or who otherwise opt out of electronic communications?
Please provide an explanation for your answer.
14)Do you agree with the opportunities, benefits, challenges and risks associated with the use of ordinary post as set out above?
Please provide an explanation for your answer.
15)Where correspondence is served by ordinary post, do you agree with the proposal that second class post would primarily be used?
Please provide an explanation for your answer.
16)Do you agree with the proposed rebuttable presumptions of delivery for service by first and second class ordinary post within the UK?
Please provide an explanation for your answer.
17)If presumptions were introduced, on what grounds do you think these should be rebuttable by the intended recipient?
18)Relatedly, what steps could be taken to address the risks set out above? Are there other risks or issues which should be considered and addressed?
19)How much notice would taxpayers and agents need for these changes, and how could Revenue Scotland best communicate it?
20)Do you have any information which could inform a draft BRIA relating to the proposals set out in this consultation?
21)Are you aware of any examples of particular current or future impacts, positive or negative on young people, (children, pupils, and young adults up to the age of 26) of any aspect of the proposals in this consultation?
22)Are you aware of any examples of potential impacts, either positive or negative, that you consider any of the proposals in this consultation may have on the environment?
23)Are you aware of any examples of how the proposals in this consultation may impact, either positively or negatively, on these with protected characteristics (age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage and civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, sex and sexual orientation)?
24)Are you aware of any examples of potential impacts, either positive or negative that you consider any of the proposals in this consultation may have on groups or areas at socio-economic disadvantage (such as income, low wealth or area deprivation)?
25)Are you aware of any examples of how the proposals in this consultation might impact, positively or negatively, on island communities in a way that is different from the impact on mainland or other areas?
26)Are you aware of any examples of how the proposals in this consultation might impact, either positively or negatively, on rural communities on mainland Scotland?
27)Are you aware of any examples of how the proposals set out in this consultation may impact, positively or negatively, on consumers in Scotland?
Useful information about responding to this consultation
As you complete your response, each page will provide the option to 'Save and come back later' at the bottom. This means you can save your progress and return to the consultation at any time before it closes. If you don't use this feature and leave the consultation midway through, your response will be lost.
Once you have submitted your response, you can enter your email address to get a pdf copy of your answers sent to you.
On the 'About You' page at the end of this consultation, organisations will have the opportunity to tell us more about their work and/or how their response was informed.
After the consultation has closed there will be a few months delay before any responses are published. This is because we must check any responses to be published abide by our Terms of Use.
All relevant submitted responses will be analysed. This may be carried out by third party organisations who Scottish Government, its executive agencies or non-ministerial offices, contract to do this work. Such data sharing will be governed by appropriate contractual arrangements to keep your data secure.
An analysis report will usually be published some months after the consultation has closed. This report will summarise the findings based on all responses submitted. It will be published on the Scottish Government website and you may be notified about it if you choose to share your email address with us.
You can also join our consultation mailing list where we regularly list newly published analysis reports (as well as new consultations).
Why your views matter
This consultation offers an opportunity to commen on the use of electronic communications as the default means of communication between Revenue Scotland and taxpayers. This will ensure that any policy and regulatory changes to electronic communications as default does not create unintended consequences.
Views are also sought on a range of issues to inform relevant Impact Assessments and ensure that the impacts of digital communications by default are fully considered.
The Scottish Government will carefully consider all responses to this consultation prior to proceeding with potential changes to Revenue Scotland's communications practices.
Give us your views
Interests
- Digital
- Economy
- Main hub
- Public Sector
Share
Share on Twitter Share on Facebook