Response 568363518

Back to Response listing

Ministerial Directions

1. Do you agree or disagree with the proposed road characteristics that would allow local authorities to consider an exemption order from the pavement parking prohibition? Please be as specific as possible in your reasoning.

Please select one item
Agree
Disagree
Please explain your answer.
No exemptions, pedestrians have to be protected. Full stop. Also, call it pedestrian protection not parkement prohibition

Exemption Order: Proposed Provisions Under Section 52(2)(a) of the Act

2. Do you agree or disagree that the form of a Pavement Parking Exemption Order should follow a similar format to the TRO example in the link above?

Please select one item
Agree
Disagree
Please explain your answer.
There should be no exemptions, ban the asbo pavement parking

3. Are there any additional points that you think would be appropriate to include within a Pavement Parking Exemption Order?

Please explain your answer.
No exemptions!!

4. Are there any alternative formats that would be better suited to this type of Exemption Order?

Please explain your answer.
No exemptions.

Exemption Order: Proposed Provisions Under Section 52(2)(b) and (c) of the Act

5. Do you agree or disagree that local authorities should have to publish details of their proposals on their website for a period of no less than a week before, and during the consultation response period?

Please select one item
Agree
Disagree
Please explain your answer.
Just ban it, plain and simple

7. Do you agree or disagree that local authorities should display the Notice of Order on appropriate locations such as lampposts in the vicinity of a proposed exemption?

Please explain your answer.
Just ban it

8. Do you agree or disagree with the proposal that there should be no requirement to advertise Notices of Pavement Parking Exemption Orders in the printed press?

Please explain your answer.
No exemptions.

Exemption Order: Proposed Provisions Under Section 52(2)(d) of the Act

9. Do you agree or disagree with the proposal that the same list of consultees for TROs should be applied to the Exemption Orders process, including Police Scotland and the other parties set out above?

Please explain your answer.
No exemptions

10(i). Do you agree or disagree with the proposal that residences and businesses, and any other stakeholders present within a set distance of a proposed exemption should have a notice placed through their door or posted to them?

Please explain your answer.
No exwmption

10(ii). If so, what would you think that minimum set distance should be?

Please explain your answer.
No exwmptions just do it

11. Do you agree or disagree that local authorities should be able to contact other possible stakeholders they may wish to inform who live out with an established contact vicinity?

Please explain your answer.
No exemptions!!

Exemption Order: Proposed Provisions Under Section 52(2)(e) of the Act

13. Do you agree or disagree that there should be a required period of time to allow for written notices of support and/or objection to be made (a consultation response period)?

Please explain your answer.
No exwmptions

14. Do you agree or disagree that this period should be for a minimum of 21 days? If no, would you suggest an alternative length of time?

Please explain your answer.
No exwmptions xemptions

About you

Are you responding as an individual or an organisation?

Please select one item
(Required)
Individual
Organisation

What is your organisation?

1975