Response 859308736

Back to Response listing

Questions

1. What do you consider to be the main aims that the Scottish Government should be seeking to achieve through European Territorial Cooperation (ETC) programmes?

Please explain your view.
Scottish Government should be seeking to achieve economic, social and regional development through involvement in ETC programmes, working across borders to tackle common challenges and find shared solutions. Collaboration through ETC programmes should focus on Scotland’s key and emerging sectors to enhance learning and innovations that will bring added value to Scotland. Key aims should include, but not limited to, the shift to a low-carbon economy, smart growth, sustainable transport, improved connectivity, preserving and protecting the natural environment, and promotion of resource efficiency / the circular economy.

2. How do you think working together with organisations from other countries could help you or your organisation or your members' organisations?

Please explain your view.
The shared geographical landscape and challenges in other countries provides an ideal base for knowledge transfer and growth – engaging with partners from other countries who are at the leading edge of research within key sectors that benefit Scotland.

European partnerships have provided our region with opportunities and developments that otherwise would not have been possible to deliver. HITRANS current involvement in Interreg programmes results in just over £4million in funding for the area at an average intervention rate from Europe of almost 70% - significantly more funding than what would be available nationally or locally. It also provides match funding that results in local projects having a far larger reach than what would otherwise have been possible. In addition, HITRANS employment has increased by 50% through involvement in European projects.

For HITRANS, working with organisations from other countries has resulted in significant learning and development in the transport sector – particularly in the field of low carbon transport such as autonomous vehicles, battery-powered trains and hydrogen ferries. Many of our European projects involve pilot testing new technologies, leading to significant investment in infrastructure and services that otherwise would not occur. A clear example is the PAV project (Planning for Autonomous Vehicles), an Interreg North Sea Region project HITRANS is leading, focusing on the development of planning strategies that incorporate autonomous vehicles. HITRANS is one of four partners across the programme area testing an autonomous vehicle, sharing learning throughout, with HITRANS due to test the technology in a rural setting. This aligns well with the CAV Roadmap for Scotland – offering an opportunity for collaboration to test, support and develop the move towards connected and autonomous vehicles in the movement of passengers and goods.

Working with organisations from other countries and involvement in European projects significantly contributes to meeting Scottish Government’s low carbon targets. An example being our involvement in projects G-PaTRA and FASTER – both aimed at reducing carbon emissions from transport and increasing EV uptake. In G-PaTRA we are piloting an electric bus in rural Morayshire that otherwise did not have any public transport services, and we have also just launched e-bike pilots in Aviemore, Grantown-on-Spey & Fort William, as well as having conducted case studies on the use of battery-powered trains between Wick-Thurso. The FASTER project is a recently approved Cross-Border project with NI & Ireland that provides HITRANS with a budget of £1.4m to install rapid charge points in our region – significantly enhancing Scotland’s capability to move to EVs, particularly in rural regions.

Regional and national strategies align well with those in Europe, and the ability to collaborate and share knowledge creates a more tailored approach to regional development as partnerships can be formed that share similar characteristics and challenges.

3. How many priorities do you think future ETC programmes should support? (Programmes can support up to three priorities plus the Interreg specific objectives - see consultation document for more information about the priorities)

Please select one item
Radio button: Unticked One
Radio button: Unticked Two
Radio button: Ticked Three
Radio button: Unticked Three plus Interreg specific
Radio button: Unticked Don’t know

4. Please rank the priorities below in order of importance to you/your organisation. (One being the most important and five being the least)

Please rank these from 1 to 5
A Smarter Europe
2
A Greener, Low Carbon Europe
1
A More Connected Europe
3
A More Social Europe
5
A Europe Closer to the Citizens
4

5. Do you agree with the conclusions of the European Policies and Research Centre report?

Please select one item
Radio button: Ticked Yes
Radio button: Unticked To some extent
Radio button: Unticked No

6. Which ETC programmes have you been involved in?

Please select all that apply
Checkbox: Unticked None
Checkbox: Ticked Atlantic Area
Checkbox: Ticked North Sea
Checkbox: Unticked North West Europe
Checkbox: Ticked Northern Ireland-Ireland-Scotland (otherwise known as Interreg VA)
Checkbox: Ticked Northern Periphery and Arctic
Checkbox: Unticked Interreg Europe
Checkbox: Unticked Urbacht

7. How could ETC programmes improve communication of funding opportunities, calls, access to information, and application processes and systems?

Please explain your view.
ETC programmes could make use of digital connectivity and social media to promote upcoming funding calls, along with more community engagement, to make clear to the public what funding is available, how to access it and what success stories have arisen from earlier programmes. This could also improve the way partners are brought together to seek funds in advance of applying. In the present setup, certain communities and groups might be disadvantaged as funding is difficult to obtain. Significant administration resource is required for proposal stages. If the application process could be streamlined across ETC programmes this would create time savings and efficiency at all stages, from application to evaluation. Administration support could be provided to those that need it to create a fairer process for all who could benefit or take part in projects.

More systemic monitoring and reporting processes would also allow for improved knowledge of eventual impacts and better benchmarking, as well as help improve communication of programme results.

8. The 2021-2027 Regulation is expected to require the Atlantic Area programme to spend at least 70% of the funding on projects which help deliver the Atlantic Maritime Strategy. In your view, what should the remaining Atlantic Area programme budget be used for? (tick all that apply):

Please select all that apply
Checkbox: Unticked to support projects under the social priority
Checkbox: Ticked to help more people benefit from the results of successful projects
Checkbox: Ticked to encourage projects to link up with others working on the same challenge to improve their work
Checkbox: Unticked other (please state)
Checkbox: Unticked don’t know

9. What do you consider to be the main aims that the Scottish Government should be seeking to achieve through the North West Europe programme?

Please explain your view.
Key aims from the North West Europe programme that align well with Scottish Government aims include:
- Inclusive growth
- Advancements in innovation
- Low carbon technologies
- Smart growth objectives
- Circular economy

10. Which of Scotland’s National Performance Framework outcomes do you think the North West Europe programme should try to help achieve? (tick up to three)

Please select all that apply
Checkbox: Unticked Don’t know
Checkbox: Unticked Children and young people: We grow up loved, safe and respected so that we realise our full potential
Checkbox: Ticked Communities: We live in communities that are inclusive, empowered, resilient and safe
Checkbox: Unticked Culture: We are creative and our vibrant and diverse cultures are expressed and enjoyed widely
Checkbox: Ticked Economy: We have a globally competitive, entrepreneurial, inclusive and sustainable economy
Checkbox: Unticked Education: We are well educated, skilled and able to contribute to society
Checkbox: Ticked Environment: We value, enjoy, protect and enhance our environment
Checkbox: Unticked Fair Work and Business: We have thriving and innovative businesses, with quality jobs and fair work for everyone
Checkbox: Unticked Health: We are healthy and active
Checkbox: Unticked Human rights: We respect, protect and fulfil human rights and live free from discrimination
Checkbox: Unticked International: We are open, connected and make a positive contribution internationally
Checkbox: Unticked Poverty: We tackle poverty by sharing opportunities, wealth and power more equally

11. What do you consider to be the main aims that the Scottish Government should be seeking to achieve through the North Sea programme?

Please explain your view.
Improving green transport and mobility – reducing emissions and improving air quality should be top aims of the Scottish Government to preserve our natural environment and improve public health. Environmentally friendly innovation also aligns well with circular economy aims – encouraging growth but with minimal wastage. Coordinated cross-border and transnational working is crucial to effectively meet these aims due to the nature of transportation of both passengers and goods. Areas within the North Sea Region share characteristics that make it ideal to work in partnership to tackle these challenges.

12. Due to the geographical area covered by the North Sea programme, there has been a focus on maritime issues. To what extent do you think Scotland should seek to align the new programme with Scotland’s National Marine Plan?

Please select one item
Radio button: Unticked Completely - all projects with Scottish partners should contribute to the delivery of Scotland’s Marine Plan
Radio button: Ticked To some extent – the programme should also support projects which are not focused on maritime/ coastal communities
Radio button: Unticked Not at all- the programme should focus on something else instead

12b. If you answered "to some extent" or "not all" to question 12, what other areas do you think the North Sea Programme should support?

Please explain your view.
It's important not to exclude areas and projects that successfully meet the programme aims of the North Sea Region but would not qualify if only limited to those that align with Scotland's National Marine Plan. Maritime issues should still be a major focus due to the geography of the programme, but other issues such as green transport, SME growth and connected communities are also important themes within the programme that could be lost if the focus was more narrowed.

13. What do you consider to be the main aims that the Scottish Government should be seeking to achieve through the Northern Periphery and Arctic programme?

Please explain your view.
Key aims from the North Periphery and Arctic programme that align well with Scottish Government aims include:
- Protecting natural heritage
- Renewable energy
- Using innovative to create competitive communities, particularly for remote and rural areas

14. To what extent do you think Scotland should seek to align this programme with Scotland’s Arctic Policy Framework?

Please select one item
Radio button: Unticked Completely - all projects with Scottish partners should contribute to the delivery of Scotland’s Arctic Policy Framework
Radio button: Ticked To some extent – the programme should also support other projects which address the needs of remote, rural and sparsely populated areas.
Radio button: Unticked Not at all - the programme should focus on something else.

14b. If you answered "to some extent" or "not at all" to question 14, what other areas do you think the Northern Periphery and Arctic programme should support?

Please explain your view.
The Arctic Policy could be used to help focus the objectives, but not be limited to only those that relate to this policy as it risks missing several important themes.

15. How do you think Interreg Europe could help public authorities improve the design and delivery of policies and related services?

Please explain your view.
By focusing on themes that will address ways public authorities can improve public services whilst also trying to reduce costs in the long term, such as smart cities utilising technology to improve the design and delivery of services.

16. To what extent should the future Interreg Europe programme also fund the work to deliver the policies developed?

Please select one item
Radio button: Unticked Not all – other sources of funding should be used for this
Radio button: Ticked To some extent – small scale pilots should be funded
Radio button: Unticked To a greater extent- a significant amount of the funding should be used for this
Radio button: Unticked Don’t know

17. How do you think the Urbact programme can help Scottish cities?

Please explain your view.
The key aims of the Urbact programme align well with strategies for Scottish cities regarding economic development, protecting the environment, promoting sustainable transport, and addressing employment, social inclusion and poverty. The Urbact programme could help Scottish cities by expanding across the whole of Scotland to include all cities, helping to take forward new ideas in urban planning and economic and social inclusion.

18. To what extent do you think Scotland should seek to align this programme with shared priorities in city-region deals?

Please select one item
Radio button: Unticked Completely - all projects with Scottish partners should contribute to the delivery of the relevant city-region deal
Radio button: Ticked To some extent – the programme should also support other projects which address the needs of Scottish cities
Radio button: Unticked Not at all- the programme should focus on something else instead
Radio button: Unticked Don’t know

18b. If you answered "to some extent" or "not at all" to question 18, what other areas do you think the Urbact programme should support?

Please explain your view.
City-region deals cover a lot of the same priorities as Urbact, but could have missed key themes and should not be treated as a catch-all. The Urbact programme could help address any gaps and other opportunities that meet the needs of Scottish cities.

19. How do you think Scotland can best continue to collaborate with Ireland and Northern Ireland through ETC programmes?

Please select one item
Radio button: Unticked through the other ETC programmes that Ireland and Scotland are part of
Radio button: Ticked through setting up a separate ETC programme with Scotland, Ireland and Northern Ireland
Radio button: Unticked by Scottish originations being associate partners in PEACE Plus projects/ making the most of the flexibility the programmes have to award funding to organisations outside of the programme area.

20. What do you consider to be the main aims that we should be seeking to achieve through collaborating with Ireland and Northern Ireland in ETC programmes?

Please explain your view.
Ireland, Northern Ireland and Scotland have significant economic, social and cultural commonality which manifests itself in our approach to regional development. The goal of all three governments is broadly to develop a regionally balanced economy with opportunities for all, with many of the challenges to achieving this prevalent in all 3 jurisdictions.

Key themes that overlap between the areas that will strongly benefit from continued collaboration include:
- Health and social care provision
- Access to education
- Low carbon transport
- Addressing rural populations
- Health connectivity
- Resource efficiency
- Circular economy

About you

Are you responding as an individual or an organisation?

Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button: Unticked Individual
Radio button: Ticked Organisation

What is your organisation?

Organisation
Redacted text